Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Arsenal F.C. players (1–24 appearances)/archive1

< Wikipedia:Featured list candidates
The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by SchroCat via FACBot (talk) 00:31, 12 April 2016 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of Arsenal F.C. players (1–24 appearances) edit

List of Arsenal F.C. players (1–24 appearances) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Toolbox
Nominator(s): Lemonade51 (talk) 18:21, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Over 500 players have made fewer than 25 appearances for Arsenal. Having checked the names, nationalities, and numbers, I feel this meets the criteria, hence the nom (hopefully someone here will cross check for any clangers). Again, I've modelled this on lists which have been promoted, and used the same database source for players as the main list. Welcome any sort of feedback, cheers...Lemonade51 (talk) 18:21, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A couple of quick comments, will return later.....
  1. The article says "Since Arsenal's first competitive match, more than 500 players have made a competitive first-team appearance for the club", but above you say "Over 500 players have made fewer than 25 appearances for Arsenal". So which is it?
The latter, corrected now. Lemonade51 (talk) 11:53, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"have failed to reach a quarter of appearances for the club" - very bizarre turn of phrase, nobody would ever refer to 25 games as "a quarter of appearances". Just say "25 appearances" -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:03, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Have done. Lemonade51 (talk) 15:50, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  1. In "They became the first southern member admitted into the Football League in 1893", why do the words "southern member" link to Southern Football League, a competition Arsenal have never played in or been associated with ? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:31, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Removed it; wanted to link Arsenal's southern ties to the 'Football in the south of England' section, but that might just be confusing altogether. Lemonade51 (talk) 11:45, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

  • Is there are a particular reason for the omission of the goals column? This is standard in all lists of this type. Seems strange to me. NapHit (talk) 00:10, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • "The list is ordered first by number of appearances in total, then if necessary by date of debut." It appears to be ordered by date of debut first to me
  • Shouldn't all defenders prior to 1960, have FB as their position instead of DF? Seeing as that is what the position key states.
  • Changed. Done the same for midfielders.
  • "and defunct competitions the Inter-Cities Fairs Cup..." this doesn't seem right to me. Need a better way of introducing the defunct competitions
  • I removed the defunct bit as it reads better just listing the competitions.
  • I think the position key should be sorted by position. So GK, FB, HB etc, would be more beneficial to the reader in my opinion
  • Done, feel free to change the table if something's wrong.
  • link for 1893–94 season in note 1?

NapHit (talk) 10:30, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@NapHit:, cheers for your comments as ever, think I've addressed all your points now. Lemonade51 (talk) 18:06, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Happy to support now. Great work. NapHit (talk) 22:27, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Mattythewhite (talk) 18:33, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from Mattythewhite
  • "Despite finishing fifth in the Second Division in 1915": I'd state the season they won it, rather than the year.
  • I feel the positions key should be like that used on other FLs, e.g. Birmingham and York. It makes it clear to our readers when the positions change.
  • I'm not sure about using the precise positions for the old positions, those wing half, inside forward and winger. You've not done the same for modern positions, not that I would encourage you to do use them.
  • "The list is ordered first by date of debut": how is it orderered after date of debut...?
  • "This feature of the game was introduced in the Football League during the 1960s": could you be more specific?
  • The aforementioned Birmingham and York lists include markings for current players and loan players (see "Player" section in key of Birmingham list). Do you feel this list would benefit from doing the same?
  • It would be beneficial, but I don't think distinguishing current from former players is necessary given it would almost defeat the purpose of having a club career end date. Lemonade51 (talk) 15:15, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Total appearances and Total goals: Personally, I would list the competitions by league and cup, and then chronoligically. Also, Arsenal only played in the Europa League when it was known as the UEFA Cup, and you've not included the European Super Cup. So, I would write "Football League, United League, Premier League, FA Cup, FA Charity/Community Shield, Inter-Cities Fairs Cup, Football League Cup, European Cup/UEFA Champions League, UEFA Cup, UEFA Cup Winners' Cup, Mercantile Credit Centenary Trophy and European Super Cup".
  • "London League Premier Division" (division) should be just "London League" (league), for consistency with the other leagues.
  • Per WP:RED, we should wikilink non-existent articles when the "subject is notable and verifiable". I would argue that all the players in this list without articles who played in the Football League should be wikilinked; it is a fully professional league, meaning they pass WP:NFOOTBALL.
  • Some flags are anachronistic, e.g. the flag of Ireland (introduced 1922) and the flag of South Africa (introduced 1994) are used incorrectly in some instances.
  • Accuracy of content: you define the club career as "the first and last calendar years in which the player appeared for the club". However, there's several players who are supposed to have played for the club over more than one year, despite making only one appearance, which is impossible using your definition. See James Charteris and Edward Williams as just two examples.
  • Sourcing: this is probably my biggest concern with the list. From examining the general refs, I take it the one you're using for the player positions, dates and apps/goals is the Arsenal Player Database. However, the dates they provide appear to be contract dates, and not debut to last app. That might explain the wrong dates referred to above?
  • Just a quick note: debut dates are from The Arsenal History. Lemonade51 (talk) 22:10, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Right, I've now gone through the entire list, changed end dates where where necessary, cross referenced them with Andy Kelly's lineup site (which is the main source for apps/goals), double-checked dates with 11v11, as well as nationalities with Soar/Tyler's illustrated book. Lemonade51 (talk) 15:15, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Further to these points, I did a spot check on Sebastian Larsson, and his years and apps/goals are wrong. Per Soccerbase, Larsson debuted in 2004 and last played in 2006, and made 12 appearances.

I feel the entire list probably needs running through, to ensure accuracy and verifiability, before I can confidently support this nomination. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 21:09, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers for taking a look at this @Mattythewhite:, I think I've answered all of your concerns, particularly the main one about sourcing. Hopefully there aren't any major issues when it comes to spotchecking, ta Lemonade51 (talk) 15:15, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks once more. For consistency purposes, all wingers are classed as forwards. I've cited the Spragg/Clarke book for positions since 2011, as well as the UEFA website for nationalties (though there aren't player lists for previous seasons, player profiles can be accessed through match archives), and Soccerbase. I would've sourced the Arsenal handbook 15/16, which also has statistics of every Arsenal player, but I don't have it on me at this moment. Gone through the list once more pre-1996 and cross-checked stats using Kelly's website, the illustrated book, 11v11 (which excludes Charity Shield matches), and the Arsenal database. Lemonade51 (talk) 17:57, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Thank for persisting, I feel this now now meets the criteria. One minor comment though: are wingers not generally regarded as midfielders rather than forwards? Mattythewhite (talk) 18:33, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks! For reasons of consistency I've decided to class wingers as forwards, given their role in the team pre 1960s was forward-like; I feel it would be wrong to class them as half-backs. Plus there are players like (Alex Iwobi), who have been positioned as a wide forward, and not like a wide midfielder. Lemonade51 (talk) 22:39, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Source review - passed
  • Spotchecks: Checked sources 2, 7, 12, 16 - all clear
  • Formatting: formatting is fine, though I personally would use links for publishers. Consider archiving your refs, just so you don't have to deal with it if any of the websites ever change the way they structure their pages. --PresN 21:20, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support – I decided to take off my director hat to review this one and didn't find any real points of concern. Looks like a very nice list. Giants2008 (Talk) 02:12, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/List_of_Arsenal_F.C._players_(1–24_appearances)/archive1&oldid=1076193502"