Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Barrio Boyzz discography/archive1

< Wikipedia:Featured list candidates
The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was not promoted by The Rambling Man 16:57, 11 November 2012 [1].

Barrio Boyzz discography edit

Barrio Boyzz discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Toolbox
Nominator(s): Jonatalk to me 20:57, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because...I believe it satisfies the criteria. Jonatalk to me 20:57, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

  • Any image?
  • "American Latin rap band the" remove the
  • "wanted to create" to "proposed creating"
  • "Charles Koppelman; who signed the group" semicolon should be comma
  • "while its lead single" change while to but
  • "while its two singles; "I Wish" and the song of the same name charted on the Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Singles & Tracks at number 48 and 86, respectively." reference for any of that?
  • ""Una Nacion" which" add comma after song name
  • " / " should be replaced by a word, such as "and", etc.
  • "List of albums, with selected chart positions, sales and certifications" your missing "studio" which should be before "albums"
  • Same goes for the other table captions used, it should included the full part too, like instead of "List of albums", "List of compilation albums", etc, as done at all other discography FLs
  • Why is nothing in the sales and certifications parameters of the tables, if there is none, then make a note of it, by placing {{N/a}} there?
  • Why doesn't the music video table have a table caption, as all others do, as per MOS:DTT?
  • Why is Billboard linked in ref. 6, and not ref. 1. Be consistent with everything. Same goes for AllMusic references, as well as others they, check.
  • It would be WP:OVERLINK to continue to do so in references as explained in several of my failed-FLC peer reviews. Jonatalk to me 13:32, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Why do some references for Billboard use {{cite news}} and others don't, they use {{cite web}}, all should use one. Be consistent.
  • Why do some references have the "106 (21): 112" thingy and others don't?
  • Because information retrieved is not currently accessible. Jonatalk to me 13:32, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Why is it "AllMusic" in some references and "Allmusic" in all others. They should all be "AllMusic", as that is the correct title name.
  • And, in some references, have work and publisher, and some just have work, or just publisher (see ref. 23, it should have publisher), this goes for all
  • Some reference titles may be incorrect, please check
  • Any external links?
  • Categories should be sorted in alphabetical order

Please try to see if the reference stuff are formatted correctly, and good, and are consistent, as FLC is not meant to be a peer review process. Thank you. TBrandley 18:22, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose prose issues, and grammar problems.... (e/c)

  • " Latin rap band the Barrio Boyzz" are they "The Barrio Boyzz" or just "Barrio Boyzz"?
  • According to newspapers/magazines they introduce the group as "The Barrio Boyzz", "Barrio Boyzz" and "Los Barrio Boyzz". Jonatalk to me 13:32, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Lead sentence, don't mix numbers and words for numericals.
  • "The groups debut album" missing apostrophe.
  • "In 1995, the group" new para, reemphasise the group name.
  • "and released four singles" no, the album didn't "release" four singles, perhaps four singles were released from the album...
  • "The Barrio Boyzz' " -> "The Barrio Boyzz's". (etc)
  • "Navidad, Tu y Yo" just links back to the band, create a new article for it if it's worthwhile.
  • "two singles; "I Wish" and the song of the same name" I thought the first was a "song" as well?
  • It is, but the second single is the same title as the parent album so that's why I wrote "and the song of the same name". Jonatalk to me 13:32, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • The point is, you've lost the context of "of the same name" by this point in the sentence. Needs reword. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:50, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • "on Latin charts on Billboard magazine." not sure I understand this English.
  • If you take a look here, Top Latin Albums and Latin Pop Albums are "Latin charts" of Billboard magazine. Jonatalk to me 13:32, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • "hovered the top 10 on the" this is not English.
  • Yes, the word is in the dictionary but not in this usage. Besides, if it didn't make it into the top 10, it was "below" the top 10. Hovering means floating on top of something... The Rambling Man (talk) 13:50, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • "which did not share chart success" - share with whom?
  • Table captions are not unique, please make them so.
  • Release dates, where are they referenced? What territory are they relevant to? (see WP:V).
  • Not sure of the point of a compilation album table of chart positions where not one single album charted...
  • This is a discography not a page that is is built on peak positions. Jonatalk to me 13:32, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Too many "releases" link straight to the band, not to the releases themselves. Red links are permitted.
  • You link Billboard in ref 6 but not in 1, 2, 3 ... 7 etc... why?
  • My point is, why is is just ref 6, when it's used in refs 1, 2, 3 .... The Rambling Man (talk) 13:50, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ref 20 - Allmusic, where all others are AllMusic... please check your refs thoroughly.

The Rambling Man (talk) 18:23, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/Barrio_Boyzz_discography/archive1&oldid=1136094305"