Wikipedia:Featured article review/Yesterday (song)/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was removed by YellowAssessmentMonkey 03:45, 15 June 2009 [1].
Yesterday (song) edit
FAR commentary edit
FA from 2004, referencing/1c issues. Article seems a bit short, considering the popularity of the song, surely there must be more discussion of it in WP:RS/WP:V secondary sources. Also, lots of short paragraphs and one-sentence paragraphs throughout, could use copyediting. There is not much info in the article about musical composition, certainly not much that is sourced. Cirt (talk) 21:28, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from Rodhullandemu
- First thoughts: Initial issues were (a) a {{cn}} tag on the original lyrics; these appear to have originated, as far as I can tell, from a factoid sourced to a poorly-written book, so for the time being, I've deleted that claim. (b) A deadlink to Guinness World Records.com, which I've resurrected from the wayback machine, but it doesn't substantiate the claim of 3000 cover versions, so I've corrected that; in particular, for a FA, the list of "eclectic" cover versions requires sourcing, and I've yet to find a reliable and definitive list. Rodhullandemu 22:37, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Have added a section on "Musical structure". Probably needs reviewing for style & against sources. Rodhullandemu 02:05, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from Realist2
- A lot of the article is sourced by http://www.beatles-discography.com/ so those all need replacing.
- http://www.oocities.com/SunsetStrip/Palms/6797/songs/yesterday.html Needs replacing
- http://www.oocities.com/~beatleboy1/dba05help.html needs replacing
- done --Andrewlp1991 (talk) 05:04, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- done --Andrewlp1991 (talk) 03:17, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
FARC commentary edit
- Suggested FA criteria concern are citations, comprehensiveness. Also note the recent change to WP:WIAFA (1c) requiring "high-quality" sources. YellowMonkey (cricket calendar poll!) 02:32, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, per FA criteria concerns. Cirt (talk) 05:01, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Still a few dead links and unsourced parts, so removed YellowMonkey (cricket calendar poll!) 03:42, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.