Wikipedia:Featured article review/Witold Pilecki/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by Casliber via FACBot (talk) 2:04, 28 August 2020 (UTC) [1].
Witold Pilecki edit
- Notified: Piotrus, WikiProject Poland, WT:MILHIST
- BUidhe, why are not all WikiProjects listed on talk notified? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:31, 28 July 2020 (UTC) [reply]
Review section edit
I am nominating this featured article for review because of the comment Eisfbnore left in May:These issues have yet be addressed, so here we are. (t · c) buidhe 17:51, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]careless and inconsistent ref formatting, with both shortened footnotes and long ones intertwined. It relies rather heavily on a single web page, which I can't access, owing to its lack of proper sertificate for privacy. Is it a HQRS? And is our copy sufficiently paraphrased? We need better sourcing than what we've got here: IMDb and Publicystyka Antysocjalistycznego Mazowsza are not HQRS. We also have a See also farm and an EL farm. It is also not particularly well written with repetitive lines like […]he was not breaking any laws. He pleaded guilty to the other charges. He was sentenced to death on 15 May with three of his comrades, and he was executed and noun + -ing, -ing, -ing He was also a vigorous advocate of rural development, founding an agricultural cooperative, heading the local fire brigade and also serving as chairman of a local milk-processing plant built in the district
- Move to FARC, no improvement. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:04, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
FARC section edit
- Issues raised in the review section include sourcing and prose. Nikkimaria (talk) 18:24, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist (as the author of the original from 10+ year ago). This was good for our standards back then, and is not even GA level now. For starters, one should get a book about the subject and read it, which nobody has done back then (they didn't exist...). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:11, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Piotrus: we don't do "Delist/Keep" until the Featured article removal candidate (FARC) part of the process. Right now we're in the Featured article review (FAR) part, which is about finding issues and hopefully fixing them. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 08:55, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I find this distinction overly procedural. Shrug. You can disregard my comment and just move it to the inevitable second part of this discussion... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:09, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Piotr, the reason we don't do that is that someone else might be interested in restoring the article. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:39, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I find this distinction overly procedural. Shrug. You can disregard my comment and just move it to the inevitable second part of this discussion... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:09, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Piotrus: we don't do "Delist/Keep" until the Featured article removal candidate (FARC) part of the process. Right now we're in the Featured article review (FAR) part, which is about finding issues and hopefully fixing them. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 08:55, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist per above. (t · c) buidhe 19:21, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:04, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.