Wikipedia:Featured article review/Objectivist poets/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was removed by User:Marskell 17:20, 18 August 2008 [1].

Objectivist poets

Review commentary

User:Christian Roess and WikiProject Poetry have been notified.

Article lacks consistent in-text citations, as required by FA criterion 2c, and all but one of the references are simply listed at the bottom of the article, with no footnote links. –Dream out loud (talk) 03:12, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple issues. You name it, it has it. 5 edits since 05 feb. ( Ceoil ^sláinte 20:29, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move to FARC - this article lacks a lot of key features and would require a lot of work to bring it up to par. It seems from lack of interest that this will not happen any time soon. It is best to remove it until someone in the future wishes to bring it up to par and then try to put it through FAC. Ottava Rima (talk) 16:09, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
See WP:FAR instructions; keep and remove are not declared in the review phase. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:13, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My remove means that there is no possible way to repair it. This section is reserved for suggestions on how to repair or thoughts on the matter. I'm following the instructions quite clearly by letting people know my thoughts now. Ottava Rima (talk) 17:03, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I edited the above to make it clear. Ottava Rima (talk) 17:14, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move to FARC, no improvement. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:52, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FARC commentary

Suggested FA criteria concerns is referencing (1c). Marskell (talk) 12:47, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Remove 1c. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 06:21, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Criterion 1c needs addressing: no-one is working to verify the content. Failed/fails criterion 3, though this may be taken care of by other processes (e.g. I have listed two images at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/2008 August 11#Image:Wcwilliams.jpg, removed one lacking a fair use rationale and tagged the remaining image for deletion at commons). DrKiernan (talk) 12:06, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Remove. Per criteria 1c, inline citations are expected in FAs. --maclean 19:04, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.