Wikipedia:Featured article review/Local Government Commission for England (1992)/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 5:29, 11 April 2015 (UTC) [1].
Local Government Commission for England (1992) edit
- Notified: Morwen, WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom
Review section edit
I am nominating this featured article for review because, while it is well-written and fairly comprehensive, it was awarded FA status back in November 2006, when standards here at Wikipedia were very different for GA and FA entries. In its current state, this page has various chunks of text, some of them fairly major, which are simply un-referenced, and that is not acceptable for an FA. I have raised this issue over at the article's talk page with the editor who first pulled this article up to FA, and on the basis of that discussion I felt that the next step was FAC. Midnightblueowl (talk) 22:52, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
FARC section edit
- Main concern: Verifiability. DrKiernan (talk) 18:57, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Midnightblueowl, where you planning to follow and keep the page updated here? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:46, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi @SandyGeorgia: I was thinking that this article should probably be delisted, but was waiting to see if anyone else agreed or disagreed. Apologies if I've made a mistake somewhere in dealing with this; it is the first time that I have initiated a FAR. Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:45, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- It would be helpful if you would update this page on progress (if any). SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:31, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- There has been no progress on the article at all; indeed, it hasn't seen an edit since November 2014. Midnightblueowl (talk) 15:19, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- It would be helpful if you would update this page on progress (if any). SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:31, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi @SandyGeorgia: I was thinking that this article should probably be delisted, but was waiting to see if anyone else agreed or disagreed. Apologies if I've made a mistake somewhere in dealing with this; it is the first time that I have initiated a FAR. Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:45, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Midnightblueowl, where you planning to follow and keep the page updated here? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:46, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, inadequate citations. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:09, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, no progress or response to concerns. --Laser brain (talk) 20:38, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 05:29, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.