Wikipedia:Featured article review/35 mm film/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was removed by YellowAssessmentMonkey 23:58, 4 May 2010 [1].
35 mm film edit
Review commentary edit
35 mm film (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Notified: Girolamo Savonarola and Films
I am nominating this featured article for review because of the massive amount of reference problems. There's dead links, citations needed, unreliable sources, and not in citation given tags in the article, as well as un-referenced sections in the articles too. Now, in case I missed some problems in this review, please add them. GamerPro64 (talk) 01:49, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Agreed 100%. There is a very serious lack in the referencing department, as the tags will quickly attest. Also, could the specs not be made into a table for ease of reference? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 00:38, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
FARC commentary edit
- Featured article criterion of concern are citations YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 23:57, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist As being the nominator and that my comments have not been resolved. GamerPro64 (talk) 00:13, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist No one's even trying to fix this one up; needs several hands working on it. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 01:05, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.