Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Nelvana/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was not promoted 03:44, 23 February 2007.
Well, the article has had a peer review and is listed as a good article. I personally never heard of this company and some might get informed that such an organisation exists. After all, Wikipedia is great to learn about all things. --Spikelee 06:40, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Fair use images do not contribute significantly to article. Per FUC - "The material must contribute significantly to the article (e.g. identify the subject of an article, or specifically illustrate relevant points or sections within the text) and must not serve a purely decorative purpose." Hipocrite - «Talk» 13:19, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The peer review says it's the seventh review; where are the other six? Since there were no comments on the review, the article wasn't actually reviewed. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:26, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: This was actually my seventh peer review as a Wikipedian. --Slgrandson (page - messages - contribs) 18:15, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.