Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Lombo Pocket Watch/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was not promoted 17:27, 8 December 2007.
I'm nominating this article for featured article because I believe this horse is the greatest thing to happen to Australian Harness Racing in years, his record breaking ways speak for themselves. LPWRHR (talk) 16:18, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose, the subject matter of an article is not grounds for becoming a featured article. Featured articles have certain guidelines at WP:WIAFA which need to be met. I recommend that you withdraw this for now, and send the article to peer review first. Some examples of things that need to be fixed include WP:MOS errors (namely headings, for example, avoid using the one = headings in articles, as well as avoiding links in headings), WP:GTL, the WP:FOOTNOTEs are missing critical information which can be provided if you use {{Cite web}}, and the prose needs a lot of work and copyediting. AZ t 16:39, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- How do I go about that? LPWRHR (talk) 16:50, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- If you want to withdraw this nom, just request it here or on my talk page. If you want to submit it to peer review, that's here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:57, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah I reckon go for that.LPWRHR (talk) 17:02, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I'll remove it from here shortly, and you can submit to peer review. Please wait for a bot to update the article talk page, per WP:FAC/ar. Good luck! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:08, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.