Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/House of Music/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was archived by Ian Rose via FACBot (talk) 01:38, 31 December 2016 [1].


House of Music edit

Nominator(s): Dan56 (talk) 20:00, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This article is about a 1996 studio album by the R&B band Tony! Toni! Toné!. It was their fourth and last album, a platinum seller, and widespread critical success, deemed by some critics as their best work, an influence on 1990s neo soul, and a masterpiece of '90s R&B. Dan56 (talk) 20:00, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Jennica edit

  • "Heyday" seems like an odd word to use. Capitalize "Platinum". I have nothing else to comment on. It looks like an article well done and any other further comments from me would just be nitpicking [I don't like tables in discography sections but that's just me] --Jennica talk / contribs 03:25, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Jennica:, I capitalized "platinum". Where is the word "heyday" used? I don't see it. Dan56 (talk) 00:13, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Dan56: - Second sentence: "During the band's heyday, it was composed of Dwayne Wiggins on lead vocals and guitar"... --Jennica talk / contribs 00:25, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Jennica:, that's the article on the band; this article being nominated is on their fourth album. Dan56 (talk) 00:34, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Dank edit

As always, feel free to revert my copyediting. - Dank (push to talk)

Comments from TheAmazingPeanuts edit

I'm not the best editor on Wikipedia, but I can tell the article has been edited well. - TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 15:08, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Closing comment edit

Sorry Dan but despite this being open almost two months and listed at FAC Urgents for a while, we haven't seen the depth of commentary necessary to establish consensus to promote; I wonder if a PR with requests to appropriate projects and music editors might get a groundswell of interest that could carry over to a re-nom at FAC in a couple of weeks or so. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 01:24, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.