Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2005 April 17

< Wikipedia:Categories for deletion‎ | Log

April 17 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Kbdank71 14:37, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Category:Jimbo Wales edit

Do we need a category devoted to one individual, even Jimbo? LevelCheck 22:29, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.


The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Kbdank71 14:40, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Category:Lists of people by religion edit

There's nothing in this category, and there's junk on the page. 212.59.23.88 17:51, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete. --Kbdank71 19:37, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep FroggyMoore 22:13, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Keep a category with no articles or subcategories? Why? --Kbdank71 15:14, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. RedWolf 04:11, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.


The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Kbdank71 14:43, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Category:Stadion edit

Has a link to the article Stadion, and contains an article about someone named "von Stadion". Eugene van der Pijll 17:13, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete. RedWolf 04:11, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.


The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Kbdank71 14:43, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Category: Prophecy timelines edit

Only contains one article. *Kat* 10:09, Apr 17, 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete. RedWolf 04:11, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.


The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus (keep). --Kbdank71 14:07, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Category:Natural history of the United States edit

It seems like the two articles here should be absorbed into other subcategories of Category:United States. -- Beland 10:07, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

It might have room for expansion. There are other categories which are even emptier, such as Category:Natural history of Hong Kong and Category:Natural history of Denmark.--Huaiwei 10:56, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I've sometimes wondered if an "Ecology of [country]" structure of subcategories by country might be appropriate—it certainly seems like the most likely grouping for the included articles. Though I know its meaning is broader than that, I think "natural history" unavoidably connotes fossils and...well, history. Ecology seems to plainly speak more to describing present conditions, and in a manner that is inclusive of everything from climate to flora to fauna. Postdlf 01:51, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.


The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was rename. --Kbdank71 13:34, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Category:European routes edit

Rename to Category:International E-road network. The "European route" name is not in common use, while "International E-road network" is the official name of the system. --SPUI (talk) 05:26, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.


The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Kbdank71 14:49, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Category:Compiler edit

Needs to be in plural form. --Hooperbloob 05:24, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

It already exists → Category:Compilers. RedWolf 07:07, Apr 17, 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge & redirect has been completed. Radiant_* 09:55, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)
    Do we really need a redirect? Do redirects work? (tested) No, category redirects do NOT work. Do NOT do that!! --ssd 12:16, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • They don't? That's odd, I did test it and it worked fine for me. Why is this considered harmful? Radiant_* 15:47, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)
      No. Category redirects do not work. They leave a category (that still exists) that can have articles in it, but is difficult to get to. Articles in that category are NOT listed in the target of the redirection, and the article has a blue link instead of a read link. A category redirect is best done as a soft redirect (with a message saying articles should be moved elsewhere). This one does not warrent a redirect, deletion is better. --ssd 00:58, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.


The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Kbdank71 13:32, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Category:Cuban music genres edit

Inconsistent with others in Category:Musical genres by region Tuf-Kat 03:54, Apr 17, 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.


The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Kbdank71 13:32, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Category:Côte d'Ivoire music edit

Redundant with Category:Ivorian music. Tuf-Kat 03:44, Apr 17, 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.


The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Kbdank71 14:06, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Category:Mathematical methods edit

It is not clear what the scope of this category is. Creator says that it should probably be deleted now (see User talk:Charles Matthews#Category:Mathematical methods). Category:Mathematical methods was created in September 2004 and contained only one article (Newmark-beta method, which can go in Category:Algorithms instead), until April 15. At that day, Category:Algorithms and Category:Root-finding algorithms were added as subcategories to Category:Mathematical methods, leading to confusion because Category:Algorithms was already a supercategory of Category:Mathematical methods. -- Jitse Niesen 20:44, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Delete. This category is not helpful. Oleg Alexandrov 15:23, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion/Log/2005_April_17&oldid=1121863290"