Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/PotatoBot 2.1

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

Approved.

PotatoBot 2.1

Operator: Anypodetos (talk · contribs)

Automatic or Manually assisted: Automatic, unsupervised

Programming language(s): Python, PyWikipedia

Source code available: Yes

Function overview: Create redirects from ISO language names to language articles, based on the ISO 639-3 codes in the {{infobox language}} transclusions (e. g. Mescalero-Chiricahua Apache language → Mescalero-Chiricahua language)

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Languages#Searching language infoboxes

Edit period(s): One initial run, additional runs on request/if necessary

Estimated number of pages affected: Difficult to estimate, but most likely fewer than two thousand redirects to create

Exclusion compliant (Y/N): No (only creates redirects, no existing articles edited)

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Yes

Function details: Cross-checks existing ISO 639-3 redirects (see Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/PotatoBot 2), language names obtained from the lists ISO 639:a etc., and ISO codes in {{infobox language}} transclusions. Creates redirects from the names in the ISO 639 lists to the language articles. Also creates redirects from ISO 639 codes (covered by task 2 approval) and logs various suspicious cases to its userspace.

Discussion

Shweet. Approved for trial (50 redirects). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. (go over if you feel it is necessary to fix your code) Tim 1357 ^talk 01:36, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Trial complete. Needed two runs because the logs contained lines they shouldn't have. All mainspace edits (i. e. the redirects) seem to be okay (Special:Contributions/PotatoBot). --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 18:04, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Approved. MBisanz ^talk 03:46, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.