Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/ContinuityBot 3
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was
Approved.
Operator: Piandcompany (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)
Time filed: 06:12, Tuesday January 22, 2013 (UTC)
Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic
Programming language(s): Java
Source code available: Base framework (Wiki-Java framework @ http://code.google.com/p/wiki-java/ ) already open-source. Task specific code to be released on GitHub after testing complete.
Function overview: This is a copy of FBot task 5/Svenbot 3.
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Fbot 5, Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Svenbot 3, Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/ContinuityBot
Edit period(s): Once a week.
Estimated number of pages affected: Based off of Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Fbot 5, 20,000 but will rapidly go down after initial run.
Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes
Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes
Function details: See Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Fbot 5. Note this bot will be run on Labs and may have output to IRC if requested for logging.
Discussion
edit- @Piandcompany - do you remember the exclusions that we talked about at Wikimania? I forget which user it is, but there's a user that has subpages (hundreds of them) with the daily free uploads. Files in that person's userspace and nowhere else still need to be considered orphaned. We got that working in Wikimania, I think, but I want to make sure that stays in there, else becomes much less useful. Sven Manguard Wha? 06:57, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- If you can confirm it's either Sven's code or that you've built in Sven's exclusions to your code, we should be ready to trial. MBisanz talk 12:53, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- The code from WM2012 does not include for this task a check to see if the file is in the free uploads gallery, I can add such a check though if you want. Piandcompany chat 17:08, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- I would prefer if you did. Use in a userspace gallery of free images isn't really use by the normal definition of the word. MBisanz talk 21:25, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- Check is now employed. Piandcompany chat 22:07, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- I would prefer if you did. Use in a userspace gallery of free images isn't really use by the normal definition of the word. MBisanz talk 21:25, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- The code from WM2012 does not include for this task a check to see if the file is in the free uploads gallery, I can add such a check though if you want. Piandcompany chat 17:08, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. MBisanz talk 23:03, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Doing... Piandcompany chat 23:04, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Done Piandcompany chat 23:42, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- Spot check complete, no f-p's detected. Piandcompany chat 23:59, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Approved. MBisanz talk 02:04, 24 January 2013 (UTC)- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.
