Wikipedia:Articles for improvement/Nominations/Archives/2017/8

Past – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

It is a very important topic but it still remains a stub.Sourcing, addition of content and....well everything needs to e doneFORCE RADICAL (talk) 05:20, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support – a significant gap in the encyclopaedia. StillWaitingForConnection (talk) 17:42, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 08:48, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I'm surprised literature is not included in the list of areas that deal with the past. – Corinne (talk) 00:00, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Meatloaf – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 480 daily hits

Support per nom although it looks like improvements have already been made :). –Davey2010^Talk 00:17, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Improvememts can be made.--BabbaQ (talk) 08:49, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I think illustrations (i.e., photos of the various countries' versions of meatloaf) would greatly improve this article. – Corinne (talk) 23:51, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pâté spread atop bread

Pâté – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 823 daily hits

Can be improved: needs more references, would benefit from more organization, and can be expanded. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:30, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. –Davey2010^Talk 00:19, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Per nom. Interesting article.--BabbaQ (talk) 08:49, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Per nom. Gets an average of 823 daily page views! – Corinne (talk) 23:49, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pre-exposure prophylaxis – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 319 daily hits

Article's sections within "Adoption", particularly on politics and funding, could use substantial expansion. Sumana Harihareswara 19:41, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support - The nom is correct.--BabbaQ (talk) 08:50, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I agree. – Corinne (talk) 23:57, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not approved (automated closure) No further input after 21 days — MusikBot ^talk 04:35, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wrecking amendment – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

Awful in every respect. Furthermore, the disfunction (and for want of a better word, politics) of politics would be a fun one to research. I would suggest that the poor page views have more to do with the lack of usefulness of the article and consequently the lack of pages that link to it, rather than lack of significance or potential interest. StillWaitingForConnection (talk) 17:41, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Improvements are possible.--BabbaQ (talk) 08:50, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Definitely needs improvement. – Corinne (talk) 23:54, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not approved (automated closure) No further input after 21 days — MusikBot ^talk 04:35, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]