Your submission at Articles for creation: Kim Loo Sisters (July 14)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Calliopejen1 were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:27, 14 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Zmdrecidoro! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:27, 14 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kim Loo Sisters (August 15)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MapleSoy was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MapleSoy (talk) 04:29, 15 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

{{Reply to: Maple Soy}} Maple Soy additional references

edit

Hi Maple Soy,

I hope you receive this message. You mentioned leaving additional references in the Talk Page but I seem to have missed them. May I request for them again?

I am also am working on in-line citations and I am using the same reference throughout the article (which I was informed is acceptable)---should I use "Ibid" in the Author Name and Date or should I list each detail for each citation, varying only at the Kindle Location # (page #)?

Thank you!

Zmdrecidoro (talk) 18:53, 5 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi, just a note that you accidentally wrote {{Reply to: Maple Soy}} with a colon, but you'd need to use {{Reply to|Maple Soy}} to make the template work.
I've moved your article to mainspace as the subject is notable, but it would be quite helpful if were made more clear which parts are sourced like MapleSoy pointed out, and if unsourced items were removed. It would also be ideal, of course, if more reliable, independent sources were added.
See you around :) – Thjarkur (talk) 20:10, 5 October 2020 (UTC)Reply