Copyright status of World Scientific Publishing edit

  Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to World Scientific Publishing. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (http://www.worldscientific.com/profiles/corporates.shtml in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:World Scientific Publishing with a link to where we can find that note;
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:World Scientific Publishing with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:World Scientific Publishing saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.

It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Deor 01:00, 26 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Note edit

Please stop your mass-linking campaign. Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 04:12, 5 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

All your edits have been removed. Please don't do that again. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 15:03, 5 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of HANDBOOK OF PORPHYRIN SCIENCE edit

 

A tag has been placed on HANDBOOK OF PORPHYRIN SCIENCE, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. CardinalDan (talk) 04:22, 6 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

May 2009 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from HANDBOOK OF PORPHYRIN SCIENCE, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. AnturiaethwrTalk 04:52, 6 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Handbook of coastal and ocean engineering edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Handbook of coastal and ocean engineering, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.worldscibooks.com/engineering/6914.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:43, 17 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Handbook of coastal and ocean engineering edit

 

A tag has been placed on Handbook of coastal and ocean engineering requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MuZemike 00:45, 17 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Releasing material from copyright edit

On Wikipedia, we use the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA) and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) to license our material. In order for the material you're submitting to be released from copyright (in which you claim to be the copyright holder), read the following information and follow the instructions under the heading "Granting us permission to copy material already online":

Hope this helps. We hope you're able to release your material from the previous copyright and be willing to license under our licenses and hence continue to contribute to Wikipedia. Thank you, MuZemike 01:15, 17 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

  • Yes, please do review this link. As things stand, any copyrighted material other than certain things deemed fair use such as record covers, book covers, film stills, etc. are simply incompatible with this site's licensing. Thanks for the contributions; I hope you'll get this squared away soon. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 03:07, 19 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Once more: Please do not, under any circumstances post copyrighted material, even if you claim it to be your own. This is for your protection as well as for the protection of this site. Thank you. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 03:21, 19 August 2009 (UTC)Reply


File copyright problem with File:7114-CoastalAndEstuarineProcesses.jpg edit

 
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:7114-CoastalAndEstuarineProcesses.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 15:52, 19 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (File:7376 HBOfPorphyrinScience.jpg.jpg) edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:7376 HBOfPorphyrinScience.jpg.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 07:48, 20 August 2009 (UTC)Reply


Proposed deletion of Handbook of coastal and ocean engineering edit

 

The article Handbook of coastal and ocean engineering has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Advertisement for a $198 book whose sales probably fail notability. Content mostly a cut and paste of chapter descriptions.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Durova318 02:59, 15 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:7376 Porphyrins.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:7376 Porphyrins.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 05:48, 28 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:WSPC-LOGO.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:WSPC-LOGO.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Hekerui (talk) 13:27, 12 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:WSPC-BUILDING.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:WSPC-BUILDING.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:27, 12 June 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Hekerui (talk) 13:27, 12 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problems with File:6914-HandbookOfCoastalAndOceanEngineering.jpg edit

 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:6914-HandbookOfCoastalAndOceanEngineering.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from the book cover. As a copyright violation, File:6914-HandbookOfCoastalAndOceanEngineering.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:6914-HandbookOfCoastalAndOceanEngineering.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Hekerui (talk) 13:27, 12 June 2010 (UTC)Reply