August 2019 edit

  Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Koeri have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 18:37, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Koeri edit

I am new here and In learning period can you tell me which comments Xxxxxxxxy (talk) 18:38, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ok edit

Ok Xxxxxxxxy (talk) 18:39, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

August 2019 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Kushwaha. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 18:45, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ok sir I got it Xxxxxxxxy (talk) 18:51, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

But I feel that some part are not true in that article Xxxxxxxxy (talk) 18:52, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Here is what you have to do. You have to go to the article you wish to edit and click "View Source" at the top. Then, it will give you instructions on how to properly go about what you want to do. CLCStudent (talk) 18:56, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
Go to Help:Editing#Protected_pages_and_source_code if you need more clarity on this. CLCStudent (talk) 18:58, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ok sir I will try to find view source tab It was very useful explaination Xxxxxxxxy (talk) 19:01, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

The "view source tab" is right where the edit tab would normally be. If you have any trouble, please let me know. CLCStudent (talk) 19:03, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Yes sir it's a big problem.as I can't find it The edit tab is simply locked and no other tab is visible Xxxxxxxxy (talk) 19:07, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

The edit tab on the top is locked out because the page was WP:SEMIed. When a page is semi-protected, the edit tab is replaced with the "view source" tag. The "view source" tag should be right underneath your username on the top of your page. Please let me know if you have any more trouble. CLCStudent (talk) 19:09, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Open main menu Wikipedia Search Show my notifications Kushwaha Read in another language

Watch this page Edit Kushwaha (sometimes, Kushvaha)[1] is a community of the Indian subcontinent, which has traditionally been involved in agriculture (including beekeeping).[2] The term has been used to represent at least four subcastes, being those of the Kachhis, Kachwahas, Koeris and Muraos. They claim descent from the mythological Suryavansh (Solar) dynasty via Kusha, who was one of the twin sons of Rama and Sita. Previously, they had worshipped Shiva and Shakta.

Demographics Myths of origin Today, the Kushwaha generally claim descent from Kusha, a son of the mythological Rama, himself an avatar of Vishnu. This enables their claim to be of the Suryavansh dynasty but it is a myth of origin developed in the twentieth century. Prior to that time, the various branches that form the Kushwaha community - the Kachhis, Kachwahas, Koeris, and Muraos - favoured a connection with Shiva and Shakta.[3] Ganga Prasad Gupta claimed in the 1920s that Kushwaha families worshiped Hanuman - described by Pinch as "the embodiment of true devotion to Ram and Sita" - during Kartika, a month in the Hindu lunar calendar.[4]

Notable people Notable people with the surname Kushwaha or Kushwah include:

Upendra Kushwaha, Indian politician from Bihar R. S. Kushwaha, Indian politician from UP Babu Singh Kushwaha, Indian politician from UP Narendra Kumar Kushwaha, Indian politician from UP Chandrapal Kushwaha, Indian politician from UP Satyadev, Indian politician from MP Bhagvan Singh Kushwaha, Indian politician from UP Satyadev Kushwaha, Indian politician from Bihar Ramratan Kushwaha, Indian politician from UP Renu Kushawaha, Indian politician from Bihar Awadhesh Prasad Kushwaha, Indian politician from Bihar Bhagvan Singh Kushwaha, Indian politician from UP Ramesh Kushwaha, Indian politician from Bihar Ganga Singh Kushwaha, Indian politician from UP Ramratan Kushwaha, Indian politician from UP Awadhesh Prasad Kushwaha, Indian politician from Bihar Ravindra Kushwaha, Indian politician from Delhi Ankit Kushwah (born 1992), Indian cricketer Kunwar Yashwant singh Kushwah, Indian politician, member of the Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly 1957–1962 Narayan Singh Kushwah, Indian politician, member of the Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly 2008–present Vishal Kushwah (born 1990), Indian cricketer Ayush Kushwah (born 1996), Leading Business man Durga shankar kushwah ( born1995 ) (Manasa Madhya Pradesh) Classification Shudra varna The Kushwaha were traditionally a peasant community and considered to be of the stigmatised Shudra varna.[5] Pinch describes them as "skilled agriculturalists".[6] The traditional perception of Shudra status was increasingly challenged during the later decades of British Raj rule, although various castes had made claims of a higher status well before the British administration instituted its first census.[a] Pinch describes that "The concern with personal dignity, community identity, and caste status reached a peak among Kurmi, Yadav, and Kushvaha peasants in the first four decades of the twentieth century."[8]

Identification as Kushwaha Kshatriya From around 1910, the Kachhis and the Koeris, both of whom for much of the preceding century had close links with the British as a consequence of their favoured role in the cultivation of the opium poppy, began to identify themselves as Kushwaha Kshatriya.[9] An organisation claiming to represent those two groups and the Muraos petitioned for official recognition as being of the Kshatriya varna in 1928.[10]

This action by the All India Kushwaha Kshatriya Mahasabha (AIKKM) reflected the general trend for social upliftment by communities that had traditionally been classified as being Shudra. The process, which M. N. Srinivas called sanskritisation,[11] was a feature of late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century caste politics.[10][12]

The position of the AIKKM was based on the concept of Vaishnavism, which promoted the worship and claims of descent from Rama or Krishna as a means to assume the trappings of Kshatriya symbolism and thus permit the wearing of the sacred thread even though the physical labour inherent in their cultivator occupations intrinsically defined them as Shudra. The movement caused them to abandon their claims to be descended from Shiva in favour of the alternate myth that claimed descent from Rama.[13] In 1921, Ganga Prasad Gupta, a proponent of Kushwaha reform, had published a book offering a proof of the Kshatriya status of the Koeri, Kachhi, Murao and Kachwaha.[6][14] His reconstructed history argued that the Kushwaha were Hindu descendants of Kush and that in the twelfth century they had served Raja Jaichand in a military capacity during the period of Muslim consolidation of the Delhi Sultanate. Subsequent persecution by the victorious Muslims caused the Kushwaha kshatryia to disperse and disguise their identity, foregoing the sacred thread and thereby becoming degraded and taking on various localised community names.[6] Gupta's attempt to prove Kshatriya status, in common with similar attempts by others to establish histories of various castes, was spread via the caste associations, which Dipankar Gupta describes as providing a link between the "urban, politically literate elite" and the "less literate villagers".[15] Some communities also constructed temples in support of these claims as, for example, did the Muraos in Ayodhya.[4]

Classification as Backward Caste See also: Other Backward Class Some Kushwaha reformers also argued, in a similar vein to the Kurmi reformer Devi Prasad Sinha Chaudhari, that since Rajputs and Bhumihars and Brahmins worked the fields in some areas, there was no rational basis for assertions that such labour marked a community as being of the Shudra varna.[16]

Kushwahas are classified as a Most Backward Caste (MBC) in some Indian states.[17] In 2013, the Haryana government added the Kushwaha, Koeri and Maurya castes to the list of backward classes.[18]

References Talk Last edited 1 month ago by Ccd121 RELATED ARTICLES Kachwaha Kachhi (caste) Hindu caste

Koeri Social community of India

Wikipedia Content is available under CC BY-SA 3.0 unless otherwise noted. Terms of UsePrivacyDesktop Xxxxxxxxy (talk) 19:14, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

I wanted to edit this page Xxxxxxxxy (talk) 19:15, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

I m using mobile tablet will it cause problems Xxxxxxxxy (talk) 19:18, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

~:Unfortunately you cannot edit the page at this time because it is semi-protected. However, you can submit an edit request by clicking "view source" and following their instructions. That will lead to you making a properly formated edit request. CLCStudent (talk) 19:20, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

That's wat is invisible 😊 Xxxxxxxxy (talk) 19:25, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Its ok you don't bother about that. I will search next time Xxxxxxxxy (talk) 19:25, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

It shouldn't be invisible. If you look to the left of the search box, the "view source" tab should be there. CLCStudent (talk) 19:26, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Left of search box means wat is the sym bol for that Xxxxxxxxy (talk) 19:28, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

My apologies. Since you are mobile it is different. I will get back to you. CLCStudent (talk) 19:38, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ok thanks for your support. What is your age ?can I ask?? Xxxxxxxxy (talk) 19:40, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

I am 22. CLCStudent (talk) 19:43, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ok.And what u do?studying Xxxxxxxxy (talk) 19:45, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

All of my information is available at my userpage. Just click my name at the end of this message, and it will take you there. Now first, you will need to scroll all the way to the bottom and click "Desktop". Once you have done that, go to the article and look for the "view source" tab again. CLCStudent (talk) 19:50, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Are u an American? Xxxxxxxxy (talk) 19:52, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I am American. CLCStudent (talk) 19:53, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
If you have a desktop computer, I would recommend using that to edit Wikipedia. Do you have access to one at this time? CLCStudent (talk) 19:55, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Not now.but I will do it soon and contAct you. At first I would follow instructions you have given me I.e when I will access computer I will see left corner of the page I like to edit Xxxxxxxxy (talk) 20:03, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

I want to tell you about this page named 'kuswahayou must have listened about caste system of india Xxxxxxxxy (talk) 20:04, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

On your desktop computer, on your top right is where you will see the "view source" tab. CLCStudent (talk) 20:04, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
You can also access the desktop version of the site on your mobile device is you scroll all the way down and click "Desktop". CLCStudent (talk) 20:05, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

In india most rollbackers of Wikipedia are from high caste.so even after sighting a genuine source they delete the relevant information about kuswaha caste so that we have nothing to feel proud Xxxxxxxxy (talk) 20:06, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Well, I am sorry to hear that. Here, we try not to be like that. CLCStudent (talk) 20:07, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

I know USA is a country which is above all orthodoxy Xxxxxxxxy (talk) 20:09, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Even usa severed its ties with England during American revolution as people there wanted a new form of society far from 3 estates of Britain and I m glad that u belong to that place Xxxxxxxxy (talk) 20:11, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Now try this link [[1]]. This should get you to where you want. CLCStudent (talk) 20:14, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Yep I found it.in desktop version and from your link also Xxxxxxxxy (talk) 20:19, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Awesome! CLCStudent (talk) 20:20, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

But I will do it tomorrow as here 1:49 a.m night .and I m feeling sleepy Xxxxxxxxy (talk) 20:20, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Are you on facebook or any other social media Xxxxxxxxy (talk) 20:20, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

That, I do not give out. CLCStudent (talk) 20:21, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

I need to contact u as I have some changes to do and it need ur support Xxxxxxxxy (talk) 20:21, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ur choice.to request was my work Xxxxxxxxy (talk) 20:21, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

You can contact me now on your talkpage. As soon as you have been here for four days and get autoconfirmed, you can also contact me via my talkpage. CLCStudent (talk) 20:23, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Its ok thanks a lot for big help Xxxxxxxxy (talk) 20:23, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Good nigt bro Xxxxxxxxy (talk) 20:23, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Good nigt bro Xxxxxxxxy (talk) 20:24, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Good night. CLCStudent (talk) 20:24, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

If I am not around when you return, and you need help, you can go to WP:HELPDESK. CLCStudent (talk) 20:25, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ok Xxxxxxxxy (talk) 20:27, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Welcome! edit

Hello, Xxxxxxxxy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! CLCStudent (talk) 18:57, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thank u sir you are very supportive I m new so I will take time to learn policy of Wikipedia Xxxxxxxxy (talk) 18:59, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Welcome edit

Hello Xxxxxxxxy and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 07:05, 21 August 2019 (UTC) Thank u sirReply

August 2019 edit



{{unblock|reason=sir I am new here and I have done nothing that an offence of sockpuppetry can be lodged Plz unblock[[User:Xxxxxxxxy|Xxxxxxxxy]] ([[User talk:Xxxxxxxxy#top|talk]]) 11:51, 21 August 2019 (UTC)}}

Xxxxxxxxy (talk) 11:41, 21 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Xxxxxxxxy (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Dear administrator I don't get wat my fault was and for which reason I was blocked. I am new to wikipedia And I just wanted to use my knowledge based upon sources to correct some deformity which I witnessed in some articles.so please unblock me Xxxxxxxxy (talk) 11:41, 21 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

As you do not understand what you did wrong, there are no grounds for considering lifting your block. Yamla (talk) 12:16, 21 August 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

About unblocking edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Xxxxxxxxy (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I understand that this has been done to protect Wikipedia from vandalism next time I will edit after sighting a proper source and will make constructive edits Sir I properly understood Wikipedia terms and policies now that without sighting proper secondary source we can't edit anything. This proper secondary source should be books ;newspaper etc .I also understand that Wikipedia is a neutral place and we all should protect it from vandalism together. The changes I will made in future will be with good and relevant reference. Thus please unblock me and give me chance to contribute in future ,#secondly I would also like to draw your attention towards the fact that I think I m {{autoblock}} as when I made my edit I was blocked without a prior warning.I think some person with same Ip address is reason behind it so plz consider it too. Xxxxxxxxy (talk) 15:55, 21 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Checkuser   Confirmed sock. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 16:31, 21 August 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If I had submitted an article before being blocked edit

Sir though I am blocked on grounds of non constructive edits. I want to know that will my article will be published or reviewed which I submitted for verification before being blocked.or it will become null Xxxxxxxxy (talk) 16:04, 21 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

It was deleted by another administrator. This is appropriate as per WP:RBI. --Yamla (talk) 19:24, 22 August 2019 (UTC)Reply