Xxxx9

Behold, the glory of Wikipedia!

Nomination of Operation Bootstrap Concentration Camp for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Operation Bootstrap Concentration Camp is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Bootstrap Concentration Camp until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. NtheP (talk) 20:41, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Operation Bootstrap Concentration Camp

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Operation Bootstrap Concentration Camp, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - MrX 20:56, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Operation_Bootstrap_Concentration_Camp

fixing — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.50.103.233 (talk) 21:04, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xxxx9 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page.

Speedy deletion nomination of Operation Bootstrap Concentration Camp

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Operation Bootstrap Concentration Camp, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - MrX 19:27, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

February 2013

Hello, I'm DVdm. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Operation Bootstrap Concentration Camp, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, DVdm (talk) 19:30, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Operation Bootstrap Concentration Camp

Hello Xxxx9,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Operation Bootstrap Concentration Camp for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Beach drifter (talk) 19:31, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Recent Edits

Hello, I'm Beach drifter. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Thomas Rivera Schatz because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Beach drifter (talk) 19:49, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Beach drifter. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Jason Flom ‎ because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Beach drifter (talk) 19:51, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your user page may not meet Wikipedia's user page guideline. If you believe that your user page does not violate our guideline, please leave a note on this page. Alternatively you may add {{Db-userreq}} to the top of the page in question and an administrator will delete it, or you can simply edit the page so that it meets Wikipedia's user page guideline. Thank you. Beach drifter (talk) 19:56, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

You can just blank your page or remove anything you don't want there. Beach drifter (talk) 20:03, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Black Journal (2013 film)

Hello Xxxx9,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Black Journal (2013 film) for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Beach drifter (talk) 20:11, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Black Journal (2013 film)

Hello Xxxx9,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Black Journal (2013 film) for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Beach drifter (talk) 20:57, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Beach drifter (talk) 20:58, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —Darkwind (talk) 21:00, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent vandalism, including repeatedly creating hoax articles. Please do not continue in the same way when the block expires, as doing so may well lead to an indefinite block. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  JamesBWatson (talk) 21:03, 13 February 2013 (UTC)