Xurtio

All the low-hanging fruit is rotten Xurtio (talk) 05:43, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:32, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

shut up

Your recent edits

It seems we do - I try to edit when I can, but time is a problem. I lose patience with wikipedia when my edits (see e.g. complex systems from 2005-7) get overturned by idiots and I have to justify my credentials to them. I find it a design flaw. Might I suggest retitling your dynamical neuroscience page "theoretical neuroscience". While the terminology is in flux, I'm unhappy with the re-direct to "computational neuroscience". they aren't the same thing. and I think pretty much all theoretical neuroscience involves non-linear dynamics. back-prop nets and ART not so much. It's complex, but I guess the thing is to remove connotations of AI and engineering. mayb you disagree Duracell (talk) 12:03, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

I completely agree! I was getting railroaded into computational neuroscience with that article at one point. As for Wikipedia design, you have to stick around and micromanage your pages if you don't want them to go sour. You can always keep backup copies of your pages too (all the code text) so that you can just copypasta if it gets too mutilated by vandals. Anyway, would appreciate your input on my project pages and think we should stay on contact to make sure our field is properly represented (it seems not well known by the general neuroscience community). Xurtio (talk) 20:21, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Dynamical neuroscience has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Dynamical neuroscience. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 02:41, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dynamical neuroscience has been accepted

Dynamical neuroscience, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

jcc (tea and biscuits) 10:28, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Xurtio/Theoretical neuroscience

User:Xurtio/Theoretical neuroscience, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Xurtio/Theoretical neuroscience and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Xurtio/Theoretical neuroscience during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 23:34, 1 October 2017 (UTC)