User talk:Xnuala/archive2

Latest comment: 17 years ago by Selket in topic My (Selket's) RfA

This archive contains 3 March 2007 through 1 May 2007

Please see the current discussion at User talk:Xnuala.


Cambridge Centre edit

I think you are over sensitive to deleting the Cambridge Centre article. In my opinion it is not "sloppy" and presents valid facts on an important building. I have seen much sloppier articles, such as that for Fairview Park which you should be more concerned about deleting. Instead of automatically considering it for deletion, be optimistic and work on improving it yourself.

A band called Sara(H) by TheMaleSeahorse edit

I think i am doing this right, I am new so if I screw something up I am sorry. I would like to have my page undeleted, I wrote something in the talk page, I don't know if it is still there, let me know if I need to remake my case or not.

I went a head and remade my case because I couldn't find my old one, please let me know when you can. Some one else responed, I would like to know if he is right. TheMaleSeahorse 21:46, 3 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Resp edit

No problem at all, if he does it again, I'll give him some time out. Have a great day, Dfrg.msc 23:34, 3 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Here's a userbox. You page has been vandalized almost more than mine! Cheers, Dfrg.msc 23:40, 3 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
You may need to change that number. He hit you page again. He's getting a block. 76 years should do it :). Cheers, Dfrg.msc 23:50, 3 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
And he's gone. My friend Riana did it. If you need any help, feel free to ask. Cheers, Dfrg.msc 23:54, 3 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi, you're welcome. In addition to fixing the links, I listed the nomination at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 March 5 using the {{afd3}} template. If you have any further questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. --KFP (talk | contribs) 23:19, 5 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Most importantly, you didn't do the third step of Template:AfD in 3 steps. Also, the "pg" parameter in {{afd2}} (step 2) should be just "article name", not "article name (second nomination)". Cheers, --KFP (talk | contribs) 23:32, 5 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
You're welcome! --KFP (talk | contribs) 23:57, 5 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Reply edit

I have replied to you on my talk page. This message is in case you don't have my talk page on your watchlist, or you are an IP who doesn't have a watchlist. --TeckWizParlateContribs@

Ethnic-group lists deletion discussions edit

Hi, I noticed you participated in at least one of these three deletion discussions:

All three discussions have similar issues but are leaning in different directions, so you may want to participate in the others, if only for the sake of consistencey and to avoid accusations that Wikipedians are being unfair to some group or groups (which is something that concerns me). I'm asking everyone who participated in one discussion to participate in the others. I apologize for bothering you if you already have participated in the others. Best wishes, Noroton 04:34, 9 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Chubaluba edit

Thanks for letting me know. :) --Strangerer (Talk | Contribs) 11:43, 9 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the rescue edit

Guess I was supposed to let him just spam us to oblivion! --Orange Mike 03:27, 13 March 2007 (UTC)Reply


143.215.155.44 edit

Hi there! I noticed that Selketbot didn't tag this IP when I posted a message on the talk page--this IP is registered as "Georgia Institute of Technology". I went ahead and tagged it. Hope this is helpful to you. --Xnuala 19:25, 14 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. SelketBot is a computer and so is not always perfect. It looks for keywords like "College" and "University" in the name of the IP address owner. Putting Institute in leads to too many false positives. Leaving it out leads to a few false negatives like the one you found. Thanks for tagging it. -- Selket Talk 19:51, 14 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Re: Gratitude! edit

Your welcome. Mine also got vandalized earlier too. > Kamope < 23:55, 15 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Okay I'll try not to do that anymore. I'm sorry. Do you accept my apology sir?

Tooj19 02:56, 20 March 2007 (UTC)Reply


No problem, couple of clicks.-Randalllin 04:45, 20 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Signpost updated for March 20th, 2007. edit

 
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 3, Issue 12 20 March 2007 About the Signpost

WikiWorld comic: "Wilhelm Scream" News and notes: Bad sin, milestones
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:39, 21 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Cheers edit

Thanks a lot for removing the vandalism on my user page! Much appreciated. Will (aka Wimt) 01:13, 24 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

IE - FF edit

You may want to try Mozilla Firefox - Portable Edition. —KNcyu38 (talkcontribs) 01:59, 24 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome. —KNcyu38 (talkcontribs) 05:07, 24 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks edit

For your kind reversion of my user page, much appreciated! :) Majorly (o rly?) 02:04, 26 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Question from my talk page edit

This must have been an edit conflict. I would never knowingly delete a vandalism warning. Sorry. Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 23:23, 26 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Signpost updated for March 26th, 2007. edit

 
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 3, Issue 13 26 March 2007 About the Signpost

From the editor: Tardiness, volunteers, RSS
Patrick and Wool resign in office shakeup WikiWorld comic: "Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo"
News and notes: Board resolutions, milestones Features and admins
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 14:36, 27 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

re: National Tom Day edit

Sure, i understand exactly what you mean, but because there is obviously a sock-puppet element to this article's re-creation i added a tag to identify that it had been recreated. By all means, revert my edit(s) and put the bio tag back up if that is what you believe should be there- i was just following instincts, i didn't bother looking at policy. Cheers, Jonomacdrones (talk) 01:03, 31 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

The hoax one? its a standard one from my TW bar, the template is {{subst:uw-hoax}}, as far as i remember Cheers, Jonomacdrones (talk) 01:13, 31 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

My RfA edit

Thank you for your support in my recent successful RfA.--Anthony.bradbury 10:32, 31 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Userpage edit

You're welcome! Happy to help, and let me know if he bothers you again. Cheers, Antandrus (talk) 16:34, 31 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Re: Gratitude edit

You're very welcome. Glad I could help rid your user page of vandalism! Will (aka Wimt) 23:48, 2 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Meh edit

Call it a sense of whimsy - and in the case of user:Fyslee, it was misplaced. If you had read Yngwie Lunchbox's contributions, however, you would definitely agree with me that he was an idiot. DS 01:18, 3 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Signpost updated for April 2nd, 2007. edit

 
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 3, Issue 14 2 April 2007 About the Signpost

Poll finds people think Wikipedia "somewhat reliable" Wikipedia biographical errors attract more attention
Association of Members' Advocates nominated for deletion Reference desk work leads to New York Times correction
WikiWorld comic: "Charles Lane" News and notes: Alexa, Version 0.5, attribution poll
Wikipedia in the news Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:28, 4 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks... edit

for reverting vandalism to my user page. He certainly had a temper, didn't he? Natalie 02:07, 5 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Article Brandon A. Harnois edit

Just being sure you do not delete my page, as it was researched and personally verified as being facual. I am NOT a spammer or hoaxer, as i do not have the sufficient free time for that nonsense.

Reply on Harnois article edit

Sorry about the delay in getting back to you; the real world intruded there for a second ;O)

I'm sure it can be speedily deleted. Various versions of the article have been speedy deleted already. I can almost recite the article word for word now. Flowerpotman talk-wot I've done 20:19, 6 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

(reply)Just looked it up to make sure. Yes, a {{db-repost}} would do the job. Flowerpotman talk-wot I've done 20:30, 6 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
(reply)No problem :O) Flowerpotman talk-wot I've done 20:44, 6 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Brandon A. Harnois II edit

I have told you that the main source of my article is a book, in which only the title and cover art is referenced online. How can I make this article acceptable for Wikipedia without the use of web references, as apparently the ones I have provided are not sufficient. Thank you for your kindness --Wikiartwriter 20:21, 6 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

RfA thanks edit

Thank you for your support on my Request for adminship, which finished successfully, with unanimous support of 40/0/0.

I will do my best to serve Wikipedia and the community. Again thanks.

--Meno25 07:54, 7 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Signpost updated for April 9th, 2007. edit

 
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 3, Issue 15 9 April 2007 About the Signpost

Danny Wool regains adminship in controversial RFA Leak last year likely to produce changes for handling next board election
Association of Members' Advocates' deletion debate yields no consensus WikiWorld comic: "Fake shemp"
News and notes: Donation, Version 0.5, milestones Wikipedia in the news
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

Special note to spamlist users: Apologies for the formatting issues in previous issues. This only recently became a problem due to a change in HTML Tidy; however, I am to blame on this issue. Sorry, and all messages from this one forward should be fine (I hope!) -Ral315

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:33, 10 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

KFP's RfA thanks edit

 

Thank you for supporting me on my recent nomination for adminship, which passed with a tally of 45/0/0. Please let me know if I can help with something or if I make a mistake. Cheers! --KFP (talk | contribs) 15:09, 10 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Re: Template help edit

(in reply to User talk:Ben#Template help)

Hi Ben, rumour has it that you are a bit of a template whiz around here :)! I was wondering if you could help me out with a particular problem I've been having whilst trying to disambiguate Media. I have found that Template:Infobox Comedian contains "medium" as a category, and "medium" links to "media". As I am not at all versed in editing and maintaining templates, I wonder if you would mind helping me out with this? Right now, every page that uses this template links to the disambiguation page. Thanks!--Xnuala (talk) 01:10, 13 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

I'm not quite sure what you're asking. Do you mean, "In which sense of 'medium' or 'media' does this template use that word?" Some comedians do stand-up comedy on stage, some act in movies and on TV, some do both, etc. For instance, Robin Williams has "Medium: stand-up comedy, actor". If you are looking at the page Template:Infobox Comedian, click "What links here" and follow the links; you'll be able see how that and other details have been filled in for various comedians. If this isn't what you wanted to know, please help me understand your question a bit better. Thanks! -- BenTALK/HIST 01:48, 13 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
I apologize if I was unclear in my question. The issue that I am having is that the template links to a disambiguation page, rather than to an article that actually provides information to the reader. Is it possible to remove the link from the word "medium", since I don't believe any of the disambiguation options is appropriate in this case. I really appreciate your reply!--Xnuala (talk) 01:52, 13 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
Done. The template now uses a popup title to explain what "Medium" means (when you hover your cursor over the word). I hope that helps! -- BenTALK/HIST 02:01, 13 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Eskap edit

Eskap edit

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Eskap, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. - Tiswas(t/c) 15:23, 16 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm not sure why you are informing me about this article. I disambiguated a link, I was not the original author. Thanks!--Xnuala (talk) 10:21, 17 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
Better safe than sorry :) - Tiswas(t/c) 10:22, 17 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

TeckWiz's RFA edit

Hey Xnuala. Thanks for supporting my unsuccessful RFA this week. I hope to keep helping and improving Wikipedia alongside you. --TeckWiz ParlateContribs@(Lets go Yankees!) 01:27, 18 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Why deletion? edit

Why delete Nancy ridgmond just because it isnt provable? Wikipedia probably has articles on aliens, spontanious combustion, or religeon!

Sincerly,

 By_the_way_911

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by By the way 911 (talkcontribs) 00:47, 22 April 2007 (UTC).Reply

AfD nomination of Frederick_Noronha edit

An article that you have been involved in editing, Frederick_Noronha, has been listed by me for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frederick_Noronha. Thank you.

... vs Sources edit

Actually, I tend to use {{sources}}, which is more likely to typo. Keeps me on my toes or something.  :-) Coren 02:15, 28 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

My (Selket's) RfA edit