Welcome! edit

Hello, Wjpool, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:12, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Joe R. Pool edit

The other editor recently active at the Joe R. Pool article, Eclary444, has claimed to be Joe Pool's granddaughter, and daughter of Wesley J. Pool, whom she has named as the archivist of Joe Pool's records. I am going to go out on a limb here and assume that you are the Wesley J. Pool of whom she spoke, so I will give you the same information I gave her: records you hold in your personal possession are not valid sources for Wikipedia articles. The point of citing sources at Wikipedia is so that other editors may consult those cited sources to verify the content of the article. Since your archives are not published or held in a public facility (like a library), other editors are not free to examine them. Posting images of said archives does not help, because there is no way for another editor to authenticate such images. Please read and understand Wikipedia's policy on reliable sources.

Also, as mentioned in the above welcome message, since you have a close connection to Joe R. Pool, you should not be editing the article at all. Instead, you may make suggestions about changes you would like to see at the article's talk page. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:12, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

I'll reiterate: you should stop editing at Joe R. Pool. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:19, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Copyrights edit

You may not copy text of newspaper articles verbatim into Wikipedia. Doing so is a violation of the newspapers' copyrights. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:18, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The discussion is about the topic Joe R. Pool. Thank you. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:48, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Recent edits at Joe R. Pool edit

In this series of edits to Joe R. Pool, you have attempted to address some of the citation issues in the article. Your edits are still problematic:

  1. Several facts are cited to Vander Hill, Bryan. A Biographical Sketch of Joe Pool. Department of History 3363: Dr. Lackman. This citation had been marked as incomplete, because there is insufficient information for other editors to find this work and verify the information. To address this, you changed the citation to read Vander Hill, Bryan. A Biographical Sketch of Joe Pool. Department of History 3363: Dr. Lackman. University of Texas. July 8, 1991. This still doesn't help, as there is still insufficient information for others to find this work. Is it a book in a library? If so, at the very least, an ISBN should be supplied. Is it a journal article? Is it a research paper? (If it is the latter, but it is not a published thesis, then it is not a valid source.)
  2. You have cited Letter from Joe Pool to Wayne Aspinall. Chairman of House Interior Committee. U.S. House of Representatives. Washington, D.C. June 14, 1968. Unless this letter is available as an artifact in a public archive (as opposed to one of the artifacts you have retained personally in Joe Pool's memoribilia), it is not a valid source.
  3. In the section about Pool's KKK investigations, you have added four citations to a simple sentence that already had two citations. This is called citation overkill, and is not only unnecessary, but actually makes the article seem inauthentic. (As in: if you don't believe these three sources, how about these six others???) Just because you have the clippings doesn't mean you have to use all of them.
  4. Ditto for Pool's activities in Viet Nam (except here, you have expanded from 3 to 9 citations!).

I had closed out the discussion I started at the Conflict of Interest Noticeboard. Perhaps I did so too soon? I urge you again, do not continue to edit this article. Make requests at the talk page only. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:06, 16 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

I understand. Thank you. Wjpool (talk) 21:45, 16 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Editing at Joe R. Pool edit

You have been cautioned, and cautioned again, and brought to the attention of administrators at WP:COIN and yet you will not let it go. Your editing at Joe R. Pool has a conflict of interest, and this shows when you add paragraphs and paragraphs about relatively banal legislation that Pool was involved with. If I need to bring this back to WP:COIN, I will. Please stop editing this article and use the talk page to discuss proposed changes. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:36, 6 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

We have asked for many corrections and additions throughout the talk page. Some of which haven't been addressed since August 11. Why is it that these are not being addressed? Wjpool (talk) 15:57, 13 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Seeing as our request aren't being considered and instead ignored to go delete everything we try to contribute, is there someone else that can be the judge of information and contributions to the talk page Joe R. Pool. Wjpool (talk) 16:00, 13 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply