WilliamBeanFanatic2
January 2020
edit
Hello, I'm DatGuy. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to William Bean—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Dat GuyTalkContribs 15:19, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2090s. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
- If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place
{{Help me}}on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: 2090s was changed by WilliamBeanFanatic2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.974073 on 2020-01-29T15:28:53+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:28, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at William Bean. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 17:05, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Materialscientist (talk) 18:16, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
WilliamBeanFanatic2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'm sorry mods this seems to be a awkward situation I am currently in, but I did leave my computer open for my child of twelve years to edit any wikipedia page they'd like and it seems like they unfortunately got me blocked! If you could I'd like to appeal my block! WilliamBeanFanatic2 (talk) 18:42, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
The first instance of vandalism occurred well under three minutes after you registered your account. As you lack sufficient competence to keep your account secure for any meaningful length of time, this is the end of the line. I want to be clear, I believe you are attempting to mislead us here. If you aren't, WP:COMPROMISED applies and so would be the end of the line for this account. Yamla (talk) 18:52, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:46, 30 January 2020 (UTC)