User talk:WikiEditor1234567123/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| ArchiveΒ 1 | ArchiveΒ 2 |
The article Fyappiy you nominated as a good article has failed 
; see Talk:Fyappiy for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RoySmith -- RoySmith (talk) 23:21, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
- @RoySmith it's a shame that the article failed GA nomination. I will try my best to fix the issues. But does this mean that I will have to again wait 5 months or will you instantly start reviewing the article when I nominate it for GA again? Best regards, WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 23:48, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
- First, I do apologize for having to disappoint you on the review. When you renominate the article, it will need to go back in the queue and somebody else will pick it up. I really do encourage you to avail yourself of the WP:GOCE service. It probably won't be fast, but that's the right place to get help with the writing issues. RoySmith (talk) 00:07, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hello @RoySmith! You had issue with the composition section being almost completely a table but I don't think there's another way of showing Fyappin ancestral villages and what clans they were made up other than using a table, don't you agree? WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 21:10, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hmmm, after looking at this for a bit, I'm not sure I have any concrete suggestions for you. I'm going to ask on WT:GAN and see if I can get some ideas, so watch that space. RoySmith (talk) 22:18, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hello @RoySmith! You had issue with the composition section being almost completely a table but I don't think there's another way of showing Fyappin ancestral villages and what clans they were made up other than using a table, don't you agree? WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 21:10, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- First, I do apologize for having to disappoint you on the review. When you renominate the article, it will need to go back in the queue and somebody else will pick it up. I really do encourage you to avail yourself of the WP:GOCE service. It probably won't be fast, but that's the right place to get help with the writing issues. RoySmith (talk) 00:07, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nazran okrug, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Koki.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Djabrail Chahkiev
Hello WikiEditor1234567123, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Djabrail Chahkiev, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Djabrail Chahkiev.
Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheLongTone}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Disambiguation link notification for January 19
An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Adolf Berge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orientalist.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:02, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Sulumbek of Sagopshi
The article Sulumbek of Sagopshi you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Sulumbek of Sagopshi for comments about the article, and Talk:Sulumbek of Sagopshi/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Geardona -- Geardona (talk) 12:22, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Help with advice
MΓ€rshala xilda sa vosh, colleague, I only recently came to Wikipedia, and I would like to make my contribution here. What would you recommend I do first? πΊβπππβπ (talk) 13:13, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- XΜona' xΜilda. I first strongly recommend reading (and adhering to them in future) the wiki guidelines like WP:RS, WP:EDITWAR, etc., and explanatory essay WP:BRD. Best regards, WikiEditor123β¦ 14:13, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- Got it, thanks for the clarification colleague! I will try to follow Wikipedia rules
- πΊβπππβπ (talk) 15:05, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
March 2024 GAN backlog drive
| Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive |  |
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
| |
| You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. | |
Your GA nomination of Chakh Akhriev
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Chakh Akhriev you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sawyer-mcdonell -- Sawyer-mcdonell (talk) 19:44, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Chakh Akhriev
The article Chakh Akhriev you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Chakh Akhriev and Talk:Chakh Akhriev/GA1Β for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sawyer-mcdonell -- Sawyer-mcdonell (talk) 07:05, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Chakh Akhriev
The article Chakh Akhriev you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Chakh Akhriev for comments about the article, and Talk:Chakh Akhriev/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sawyer-mcdonell -- Sawyer-mcdonell (talk) 19:44, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
CE request completed
 | Hello, WikiEditor1234567123. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Fyappiy at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Sheriff | β 911 | 02:06, 10 March 2024 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of Nazran uprising
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nazran uprising you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Asilvering -- Asilvering (talk) 22:22, 27 March 2024 (UTC)