Wandering Westerner
Welcome!
editHi Wandering Westerner! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
The rule that affects you most as new or IP editor is the prohibition on making any edit related to Palestine/Israel conflict unless you are logged into an account and that account is at least 30 days old and has made at least 500 edits.
This prohibition is broadly construed, so it includes edits such as adding the reaction of a public figure concerning the conflict to their article or noting the position of a company or organization as it relates to the conflict.
The exception to this rule is that you may request a specific change to an article on the talk page of that article or at this page. Please ensure that your requested edit complies with our neutral point of view and reliable sourcing policies, and if the edit is about a living person our policies on biographies of living people as well.
Any edits you make contrary to these rules are likely to be reverted, and repeated violations can lead to your being blocked from editing.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:09, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
editYou have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:09, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- This is a warning. If you continue to violate WP:ECR you will be blocked from editing. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:50, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- Who the fuck do you think you are? I am protesting an obvious political bias in the Wikipedia editors of this article. How dare you warn me? I will doxx you. Wandering Westerner (talk) 16:53, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- For the record, I am not removing the link because I am censoring it, but rather because the random website hosting it doesnt have a valid fair use claim for it, and we cant link to unambiguous copyright violations. nableezy - 17:33, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- Yet, you did not apply this same standard to any of the links in the References section of this article. You are all hypocrites and deserve severe ridicule. Wandering Westerner (talk) 18:01, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- Those all are fair use, news organizations usually can use copyrighted content when they are reporting on it. A random blog can’t. You can look this username up if you’d like to find your preconceptions about me challenged. nableezy - 18:04, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- Yet, you did not apply this same standard to any of the links in the References section of this article. You are all hypocrites and deserve severe ridicule. Wandering Westerner (talk) 18:01, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- For the record, I am not removing the link because I am censoring it, but rather because the random website hosting it doesnt have a valid fair use claim for it, and we cant link to unambiguous copyright violations. nableezy - 17:33, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- Who the fuck do you think you are? I am protesting an obvious political bias in the Wikipedia editors of this article. How dare you warn me? I will doxx you. Wandering Westerner (talk) 16:53, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
March 2024
edit{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:07, 1 March 2024 (UTC)