User talk:Vyvagaba/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

December 2023

Hello, I'm Scope creep. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sultan Al Jaber have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Added external links to the main body. This is promotional. scope_creep^Talk 23:35, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for reaching out; I must have slipped up when adding the reference, I've been working on the greenwashing part of the article, so I'm not trying to promote anything. Vyvagaba (talk) 06:17, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Government of Sharjah Logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Government of Sharjah Logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:12, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Economy of the Arab League. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 22:29, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

February 2024

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Ed Koch, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 16:59, 9 February 2024 (UTC)