Vyshakho

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Mohanlal has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Tommy! 17:46, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —SpacemanSpiff 19:38, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Please do not randomly remove and add categories. Also review WP:MOS and WP:MOSFLAG. —SpacemanSpiff 19:39, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Priyamani, you may be blocked from editing. —C.Fred (talk) 04:31, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vyshakh Nambiar

The article Vyshakh Nambiar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

One of a bunch of seemingly pointless redirects created by user Vyshakho, all pointing to the same page.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AtticusX (talk) 11:26, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Thriller (film)

The article Thriller (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is one of many seemingly frivolous redirects created by user Vyshakho, all pointing to the same article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AtticusX (talk) 11:29, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Yshakh

The article Yshakh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

One of many similar redirects created by Vyshakho, all leading inexplicably to Peralasseri.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AtticusX (talk) 11:31, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of VYSHAKH.O

The article VYSHAKH.O has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

One of a host of seemingly frivolous redirects created by Vyshakho.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AtticusX (talk) 11:33, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vyshakh Peralasseri

The article Vyshakh Peralasseri has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

One of a host of seemingly frivolous redirects created by Vyshakho.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AtticusX (talk) 11:33, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vyshakh Peralassery

The article Vyshakh Peralassery has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

One of a host of seemingly frivolous redirects created by Vyshakho.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AtticusX (talk) 11:35, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vyshakh o

The article Vyshakh o has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

One of a host of seemingly frivolous redirects created by Vyshakho.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AtticusX (talk) 11:35, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vysakh

The article Vysakh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

One of a host of seemingly frivolous redirects created by Vyshakho.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AtticusX (talk) 11:36, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vyshak

The article Vyshak has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

One of a host of seemingly frivolous redirects created by Vyshakho.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AtticusX (talk) 11:36, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vaishak

The article Vaishak has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

One of a host of seemingly frivolous redirects created by Vyshakho.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AtticusX (talk) 11:36, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vaishakh

The article Vaishakh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

One of a host of seemingly frivolous redirects created by Vyshakho.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AtticusX (talk) 11:37, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vyshakh

The article Vyshakh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

One of a host of seemingly frivolous redirects created by Vyshakho.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AtticusX (talk) 11:37, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vyshakh Abraham

The article Vyshakh Abraham has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

One of a host of seemingly frivolous redirects created by Vyshakho.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AtticusX (talk) 11:38, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

{{unblock|Sir please , I must agree terms and condition}}

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Malayali

Category:Malayali, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. AtticusX (talk) 02:22, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Vyshakh listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Vyshakh. Since you had some involvement with the Vyshakh redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). AtticusX (talk) 02:35, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Vyshakh Abraham listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Vyshakh Abraham. Since you had some involvement with the Vyshakh Abraham redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). AtticusX (talk) 02:36, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —SpacemanSpiff 02:44, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vyshakho (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Sir please helpme. I must read and agree wikipedia rules and regulation

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information.  —  Tivedshambo  (t/c) 12:10, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.