Vkaralewich

Hey Vkaralewich! I noticed you started working​on a new page. Before you work too hard on it, remember that Wikipedia is only going to accept entries on notable subjects. That is, if no one outside of where you live has ever heard of that business, and they've never been mentioned on a reliable source, your article might not make it. If you need help with that, just type {{help me}}, and don't hesitate to leave a message on my talk page! Aamri2 (talk) 21:59, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roger J. Muller Jr. (March 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nearlyevil665 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Roger J. Muller Jr. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

nearlyevil665 16:21, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Vkaralewich! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! nearlyevil665 16:21, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

March 2024

Hello Vkaralewich. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Vkaralewich. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Vkaralewich|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 23:52, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi I am not being paid!! Vkaralewich (talk) 16:52, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

You claimed that the professional looking image of Mr. Muller is your own personal work. What is your connection to him? 331dot (talk) 17:58, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

I don't really know how to add an image to wikipedia so I googled his name and uploaded the image. I don't think there was any other option so I just did it that way Vkaralewich (talk) 18:00, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Its Muller not Mueller! Vkaralewich (talk) 18:00, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Apologies for the autocorrect error. You will need to immediately go to Commons and request deletion of the image, as his company website states All Rights Reserved. Images are.not relevant to the draft process anyway, which only considers the text and sources. Images can wait until the draft is accepted.

I ask again, what is your connection to him? 331dot (talk) 18:12, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

No connection but I live in Hoboken and see his ads all the time and drive past his ad in the Lincoln tunnel every day to work Vkaralewich (talk) 18:14, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for the clarification. Just request deletion of the image ASAP, please. 331dot (talk) 18:23, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Ok again new to wikipedia but I added the speedy delete image to the line so hopefully that was the correct method of doing that Vkaralewich (talk) 18:32, 29 March 2024 (UTC)