Speedy deletion of Vigneswaran kannan edit

 

A tag has been placed on Vigneswaran kannan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TNX-Man 13:16, 16 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

{{Hangon}} edit

Hiya. Your userpage isn't currently up for speedy deletion, so don't put {{hangon}} on it, ok? Thanks! Kylu (talk) 01:49, 21 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi Kylu..but the content is not appearing on wikipedia..when the search is done.thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vignesv (talkcontribs)

Someone already deleted the page. Hangon won't bring it back. Kylu (talk) 04:01, 21 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Kylu,pls advise me wht should i do to make the page back appear online.Thank you

I'd suggest working on it at User:Vignesv/Sandbox until you have enough information to make the subject notable. If you have a conflict of interest (like, say, the subject of the article is yourself) or the article is copied from a copyrighted source, then it'd just be best to work on a different article. Kylu (talk) 06:37, 21 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

February 2012 edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia.

I noticed that your user subpage at User:Vignesv may not meet Wikipedia's user page guideline. If you believe that your userpage does not violate our guidelines, please leave a note here and we can discuss it. As an alternative, you may add {{Db-userreq}} to the top of the page in question and an administrator will delete it, or you can simply edit the page so that it meets Wikipedia's userpage guidelines. Thank you. Kiko4564 (talk) 15:38, 19 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

October 2017 edit

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of unaccredited institutions of higher education, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 14:19, 22 October 2017 (UTC)Reply