Wikipedia

Victordiazbl

Joined 13 February 2015
Latest comment: 6 months ago by Queen of Hearts in topic Welcome!
Learn more about this page

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eblana Solutions (January 16)

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 09:52, 16 January 2018 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Victordiazbl, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 09:52, 16 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rockbrook International (January 16)

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KJP1 was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Two issues: First, to me, this reads like an advertisement. Second, its single source is to its own website. That's not suitable to establish Notability or to allow Verification of content. Sources need to be from Reliable outlets that are independent of the article subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KJP1 (talk) 09:58, 16 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rockbrook International (January 16)

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by St170e was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
You have no secondary sources – your third one is a broken link. You need significant coverage to show notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
st170e 19:59, 16 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rockbrook International (January 17)

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dial911 was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
It still reads like a promotional content. Also, provide at least one reliable independent source.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dial911 (talk) 21:57, 17 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Rockbrook International

edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Hello, Victordiazbl. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rockbrook International".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hhkohh (talk) 13:12, 5 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Lista de oponentes a Fiducia Supplicans

edit

Tras la publicación de la declaración Fiducia supplicans por parte del Dicasterio para la Doctrina de la Fe (DDF) de la Iglesia Católica el 18 de diciembre de 2023, se creo una revuelta interna en la iglesia con miles de opositores que no tiene precedentes en la historia.

El prefecto del DDF, quien publica este documento, fue el Cardenal Víctor Manuel Fernández, conocido amigo del Papa, también argentino, que había sido nombrado en su puesto tan sólo unos meses antes, el pasado 1 de julio de 2023. Dicho documento vino firmando también por el mismo Romano Pontífice, el Papa Francisco.

En menos de una semana cardenales, obispos, teólogos, conferencias episcopales enteras, medios de comunicación católicos y diversas autoridades eclesiásticas han manifestado su preocupación y confusión indicando, según ellos, que el texto es ambiguo, llama al equívoco, está redactado con un lenguaje lioso con la posible idea de seguir publicando más documentos de índole liberal en un futuro próximo y lo más grave para estos opositores es que contradice la Doctrina de la Iglesia Católica y su Magisterio.

Es cierto que esta declaración contradice el documento de 2021 sobre la misma temática, también firmado por el Papa Francisco, ya que en el actual documento se indica que se puede bendecir a parejas homosexuales y en el de 2021 se dejaba claro que no. Por ello, siendo además el mismo papa el que firma los dos documentos, se ha creado un estado de incertidumbre muy grande dentro de la Iglesia Católica.

Muchos de los opositores se han mostrado preocupados por la unidad de la Iglesia aunque en general manifiestan respeto por su superior, el Papa Francisco, pero se han visto obligados a salir en medios de comunicación o redes sociales indicando su disconformidad con el documento o pidiendo explicación sobre puntos confusos del mismo. Algunos piden la objeción de conciencia ya que consideran que no es correcto, siguiendo su moral católica, seguir este documento, argumentando que va en contra de sus principios y valores. En algunos casos, minoritarios, algunas autoridades eclesiásticas han mostrado su disconformidad con fuertes palabras, planteando la declaración con tildes herejes y como el principio de un cisma.

Por parte de iglesias ortodoxas, algunos patriarcas también se han visto preocupados por dicha declaración y algunos de ellos han indicado que todo el ecumenismo trabajado durante las décadas pasadas queda de momento paralizado ya que por el momento, después de esta declaración, no se muestran proclives al diálogo y al acercamiento de ambas religiones.

Lista de Conferencias Episcopales opositoras a Fiducia Supplicans

  • Conferencia Episcopal de Malawi[1]
  • Conferencia Episcopal de Zambia[2]
  • Conferencia Episcopal de Nigeria[3]
  • Conferencia Episcopal de Ghana[4]
  • Conferencia Episcopal de los obispos de rito latino de Ucrania[5]
  • Conferencia Episcopal de Benin[6]
  • Conferencia Episcopal de Togo[7]
  • Conferencia Episcopal de Ruanda[8]
  • Simposio de Conferencias Episcopales de África y Madagascar[9]
  • Conferencia Episcopal de Polonia[10]
  • Conferencia Episcopal de Camerún[11]
  • Sínodo de la Iglesia Greco-Católica (rito bizantino) de Ucrania[12]
  • Conferencia Episcopal de Zimbabwe[13]
  • Conferencia Episcopal de Angola y Santo Tomé[14]
  • Conferencia Episcopal de Congo[15]
  • Conferencia Episcopal de Burundi[16]
  • Conferencia Episcopal de Haiti[17]
  • Conferencia Episcopal de las Antillas[18]
  • Conferencia Episcopal de Hungría[19]
  • Conferencia Episcopal de Costa de Marfil[20]
  • Conferencia Episcopal de Mozambique[21]
  • Conferencia Episcopal de Senegal[22]
  • Conferencia Episcopal de Burkina Faso - Niger[23]

Cardenales y obispos opositores a Fiducia Supplicans

  • Mons. Joseph Strickland, obispo emérito de Tyler[24]
  • Obispos de la arquidiócesis de Astana[25]
  • Mons. José Munilla, obispo de Orihuela-Alicante[26]
  • Mons. Jaime Fuentes, obispo emérito de Minas
  • Cardenal Gerhard Müller[27]
  • Mons. Carlo Maria Viganò[28]
  • Mons. Marian Eleganti, obispo emérito de Coira[29]
  • Cardenal Fridolin Ambongo, arzobispo de Kinsasa[30]
  • Mons. Víctor Masalles, obispo emérito de Bani[31]
  • Cardenal Wilfrid Fox Napier OFM, arzobispo emérito de Durban[32]
  • Mons. Jesús Sanz Montes OFM, arzobispo de Oviedo[33]
  • Mons. Alberto Molina Palma, arzobispo de Los Altos en Guatemala
  • Cardenal Jean-Pierre Kutwa, arzobispo de Abidjan[34]
  • Mons. Héctor Aguer, arzobispo emérito de La Plata[35]
  • Mons. Robert Mutsaerts, obispo auxiliar de Hertogenbosch[36]
  • Mons. Charles Chaput, arzobispo emérito de Filadelfia[37]
  • Mons. Adair Guimarães, obispo de Formosa, Brasil
  • Cardenal Daniel Sturla, arzobispo de Montevideo[38]
  • Mons. Philip Anyolo, arzobispo de Nairobi[39]
  • Mons. Czeslaw Kozon, obispo de Copenhagen[40]
  • Mons. Eric Varden, ocso, obispo de Trondheim[41]
  • Mons. Bernt Eidsvig, obispo de Oslo[42]
  • Mons. Hans Hendricks, obispo de Amsterdam[43]
  • Mons. Michael Nazir-Ali, Prelado de Su Santidad, ex-obispo anglicano de Rochester
  • Mons. Gintara Grušas, arzobispo de Vilnius[44]
  • Mons. Antonio Suetta, obispo de Vintimiglia-San Remo[45]
  • Mons. Marc Aillet, obispo de Bayonne[46]
  • Mons. Philippe Anyolo, arzobispo de Nairobi[47]
  • Mons. Donald DeGrood, obispo de Sioux Falls[48]
  • Mons. Peter Muhich, obispo de Rapid City[49]
  • Mons. Michel Aupetit, arzobispo emérito de París[50]

Congregaciones y asociación sacerdotales, religiosas y laicales

  • Fraternidad Sacerdotal San Pío X[51]
  • British Confraternity of Catholic Clergy[52]
  • Provincia de Estados Unidos y Argentina de los Padres Marianos de la Inmaculada Concepción[53]
  • Orden de los Redentoristas Transalpinos[54]
  • Corporación de Abogados Católicos de Argentina[55]
  • Confraternidad del Clero Católico de Estados Unidos[56]
  • Confraternidad del Clero Católico de Australia[57]

References

  1. ^ https://twitter.com/RorateCaeli/status/1737184988288946181
  2. ^ https://x.com/ednyoka/status/1737441037583352086?s=20
  3. ^ https://twitter.com/frjamesa/status/1737576981099610510
  4. ^ https://www.aciafrica.org/news/9860/weve-no-rites-for-such-things-bishop-in-ghana-on-blessing-of-same-sex-marriages
  5. ^ https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2023/12/ukraine-bishops-conference-chooses.html
  6. ^ https://www.aciafrique.org/news/9446/lhomosexualite-est-contraire-a-la-volonte-de-dieu-depuis-la-creation-du-monde-les-eveques-du-benin
  7. ^ https://www.republicoftogo.com/toutes-les-rubriques/societe/benediction-des-couples-homosexuels-reticence-des-eveques-togolais
  8. ^ https://twitter.com/ArchKigali/status/1737888235399921671?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1737888235399921671%7Ctwgr%5Ee92a5cc6af1859b1b18568dee4aa0afdda4a3abc%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fsecretummeummihi.blogspot.com%2F
  9. ^ https://secretummeummihi.blogspot.com/
  10. ^ https://www.complicitclergy.com/2023/12/21/polish-bishops-people-in-same-sex-relationships-cannot-receive-a-blessing/
  11. ^ https://actucameroun.com/2023/12/22/les-eveques-du-cameroun-contre-les-benedictions-des-couples-homosexuels-declaration/?utm_content=cmp-true
  12. ^ https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2023/12/ukrainian-greek-catholic-church-second.html
  13. ^ https://twitter.com/CatholicSat/status/1738225578724266152?t=BdkeYAhcqXhSmncSfoDObw&s=03
  14. ^ https://www.voaportugues.com/a/bispos-da-ceast-em-revolta-contra-decis%C3%A3o-do-papa/7410649.html
  15. ^ https://secretummeummihi.blogspot.com/2023/12/decimos-no-cualquier-forma-de-bendicion.html
  16. ^ https://eglisecatholique.bi/index.php/fr/vie-de-l-eglise1/communiques/communique-de-la-conference-des-eveques-catholiques-du-burundi-concernant-la-declaration-fiducia-supplicans-du-dicastere-pour-la-doctrine-de-la-foi
  17. ^ https://www.haitilibre.com/article-41278-haiti-flash-le-vatican-autorise-la-benediction-des-couples-homosexuels-reactions-des-eveques-d-haiti.html
  18. ^ https://aecbishops.org/statement-from-the-bishops-of-the-antilles-episcopal-conference-on-the-declarations-fiducia-supplicans/
  19. ^ https://www.reddit.com/r/Catholicism/comments/18s1cgd/hungarian_bishops_conference_responds_to_vatican/
  20. ^ https://news.abidjan.net/articles/727500/religion-leglise-catholique-de-cote-divoire-demande-aux-pretres-de-sabstenir-des-benedictions-de-couples-de-meme-sexe-et-ceux-en-situation-irreguliere-officiel
  21. ^ https://drive.google.com/file/d/1L8XCBcz2iT7ME422hx7ffV2wNILlmVvF/view
  22. ^ https://secretummeummihi.blogspot.com/2023/12/obispos-de-senegal-toman-posicion-sobre.html?m=1
  23. ^ https://www.aciafrica.org/news/9870/fiducia-supplicans-catholic-bishops-in-burkina-faso-niger-urge-calmness-firm-faith
  24. ^ https://infovaticana.com/2023/12/19/obispo-strickland-tenemos-que-decir-no-a-la-bendicion-de-parejas-homosexuales/
  25. ^ https://www.infocatolica.com/blog/notelacuenten.php/2312190740-un-arzobispo-prohibe-la-bendi
  26. ^ https://www.infocatolica.com/?t=noticia&cod=47682
  27. ^ https://infovaticana.com/2023/12/21/muller-advierte-a-los-sacerdotes-de-que-cometeran-sacrilegio-si-bendicen-parejas-homosexuales/
  28. ^ https://www.aldomariavalli.it/2023/12/21/video-di-monsignor-vigano-sulla-fiducia-supplicans/amp/
  29. ^ http://infovaticana.com/2023/12/21/obispo-emerito-suizo-no-puede-bendecirse-una-union-pecaminosa/
  30. ^ http://infovaticana.com/2023/12/21/obispo-emerito-suizo-no-puede-bendecirse-una-union-pecaminosa/
  31. ^ https://infovaticana.com/2023/12/22/el-obispo-emerito-de-bani-pide-a-todas-las-conferencias-episcopales-del-mundo-que-se-planten-contra-las-bendiciones-a-parejas-homosexuales/
  32. ^ https://twitter.com/CardinalNapier?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1737743685813510459%7Ctwgr%5Efc4cb90538f351b467a5b5663d4d4c00fc36c22e%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.catholicarena.com%2Flatest%2Fvaticandoc211223
  33. ^ https://twitter.com/jsmofm/status/1738244142323409373?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet
  34. ^ https://information.tv5monde.com/afrique/benediction-des-couples-homosexuels-par-leglise-larcheveque-dabidjan-demande-ses-fideles
  35. ^ https://centropieper.blogspot.com/2023/12/fiducia-supplicans-no-debe-ser.html
  36. ^ https://www.complicitclergy.com/2023/12/21/citing-diabolical-ambiguity-dutch-bishop-pleads-for-clarity/
  37. ^ https://www.infocatolica.com/?t=noticia&cod=48304
  38. ^ https://www.elpais.com.uy/informacion/sociedad/sturla-cree-que-instruccion-de-vaticano-sobre-parejas-del-mismo-sexo-no-debio-surgir-en-navidad-y-no-bendecira-este-tipo-de-uniones?fbclid=IwAR1RSW4pGwP0c1R76AKcgijd1zRoo8uq5h6frDHn7C2kN6tvkm6w5GEeytA
  39. ^ https://www.citizen.digital/news/bishop-anyolo-defies-popes-decision-forbids-blessing-of-same-sex-couples-in-nairobi-n333736
  40. ^ https://www.katolsk.dk/den-katolske-kirke-i-danmark/aktuelt/single-news/biskoppen-om-troslaeredikasteriets-erklaering-om-den-pastorale-betydning-af-velsignelser-herunder-af-personer-af-samme-koen
  41. ^ https://www.katolsk.dk/den-katolske-kirke-i-danmark/aktuelt/single-news/biskoppen-om-troslaeredikasteriets-erklaering-om-den-pastorale-betydning-af-velsignelser-herunder-af-personer-af-samme-koen
  42. ^ https://www.katolsk.no/nyheter/2023/12/vatikanet-klargjor-utvikling-i-kirkens-laere-om-velsignelser
  43. ^ https://www.arsacal.nl/?p=contentitem&id=3335&t=Mogen+priesters+homorelaties+gaan+zegenen
  44. ^ https://www.vilnensis.lt/arkivysk-g-grusas-apie-deklaracija-fiducia-supplicans-del-palaiminimu-pastoracines-reiksmes/
  45. ^ https://www.diocesiventimiglia.it/note-su-fiducia-supplicans/
  46. ^ https://www.infocatolica.com/?t=noticia&cod=48348
  47. ^ https://www.aciafrica.org/news/9887/nairobi-archbishop-prohibits-blessing-of-irregular-unions-explains-concept-of-blessing
  48. ^ https://www.sfcatholic.org/bishop-degrood/statement-of-the-bishops-of-south-dakota-joint-letter-of-fiducia-supplicans/
  49. ^ https://www.sfcatholic.org/bishop-degrood/statement-of-the-bishops-of-south-dakota-joint-letter-of-fiducia-supplicans/
  50. ^ https://www.infocatolica.com/?t=noticia&cod=48335
  51. ^ https://fsspx.news/es/news/comunicado-prensa-del-superior-general-la-fsspx-41522
  52. ^ https://confraternityccb.org.uk/#:~:text=The%20Confraternity%20of%20Catholic%20Clergy%20represents%20over%20500%20British%20priests,governors%2C%20chaplains%20or%20parish%20priests.
  53. ^ https://twitter.com/ChristineNiles1/status/1738053369439105216?t=xFN2xYMD7ToeLw-_o526QQ&s=08
  54. ^ https://papastronsay.blogspot.com/2023/12/on-declaration-fiducia-supplicans-our.html?m=1
  55. ^ https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gQyulzh7UyZg_gJzpIpTMY7XZL-J4Y02/view?usp=drive_link.
  56. ^ https://blog.messainlatino.it/2023/12/fiducia-supplicans-anche-le.html#
  57. ^ https://blog.messainlatino.it/2023/12/fiducia-supplicans-anche-le.html#

Your article Lista de oponentes fiducia supplicans

edit
Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

  Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Lista de oponentes fiducia supplicans to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages needing translation into English, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. ChaotıċEnby(t · c) 00:00, 2 January 2024 (UTC)Reply


Welcome!

edit
Latest comment: 6 months ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Hello, Victordiazbl, and welcome to Wikipedia! While efforts to improve Wikipedia are always welcome, unfortunately your contributions are not written in an English that is good enough to be useful. You appear to be more familiar with Spanish; did you know there is a Wikipedia in Spanish? You may prefer to contribute there instead. In any case, welcome to the project, and thank you for your efforts! If you need help, please feel free to notify me on my talk page. QueenofHearts 00:21, 2 January 2024 (UTC)Reply


¡Bienvenido!

edit

¡Hola Victordiazbl, bienvenido a Wikipedia! Si bien todos los esfuerzos para mejorar la Wikipedia son bien recibidos, desdichadamente su nivel de inglés no parece idóneo para hacer contribuciones de utilidad, o las contribuciones no estan escritas en inglés. ¿Sabía que existe una Wikipedia en español? Quizás prefiera contribuir ahí. De cualquiera forma, reciba la más cordial bienvenida a Wikipedia y nuestro agradecimiento por esforzarse. Si necesita ayuda, puede notificármelo en mi página de discusión. QueenofHearts 00:21, 2 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Victordiazbl&oldid=1193087791"