Welcome!

Hello, Venmon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Venmon, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Riotrocket8676 You gotta problem with that? 01:41, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Venmon

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Venmon, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Riotrocket8676 You gotta problem with that? 01:41, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Betamon

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Betamon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. -Zeus-uc 01:54, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of BlackAgumon

edit
 

A tag has been placed on BlackAgumon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. FlyingToaster 01:57, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

February 2009

edit

  Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -Zeus-uc 02:36, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply


Talkback

edit
 
Hello, Venmon. You have new messages at -Zeus-'s talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-Zeus-uc 04:22, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Venmon

edit
 

I have nominated Venmon, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Venmon. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 02:11, 12 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Final Fantasy loveless

edit
 

I have nominated Final Fantasy loveless, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Final Fantasy loveless. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 02:12, 12 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Elecmon

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Elecmon, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Shawnpoo (talk) 02:38, 7 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Gotsumon

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Gotsumon, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Shawnpoo (talk) 02:39, 7 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Vi-Elecmon

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Vi-Elecmon, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Shawnpoo (talk) 02:44, 7 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

February 2010

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Transitional fossil has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Boomshadow talk contribs 04:21, 6 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Betamon

edit
 

The article Betamon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable fictional character. He is already mentioned in passing in a couple of list articles, but there is no need for this information to be merged anywhere.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. J Milburn (talk) 18:03, 23 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

List of all digimon listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of all digimon. Since you had some involvement with the List of all digimon redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:43, 12 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Every digimon listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Every digimon. Since you had some involvement with the Every digimon redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:44, 12 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

All digimon listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect All digimon. Since you had some involvement with the All digimon redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:45, 12 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Final Fantasy loveless listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Final Fantasy loveless. Since you had some involvement with the Final Fantasy loveless redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 14:10, 18 July 2016 (UTC)Reply