ValePari Dipaolo

Welcome

Hello ValePari Dipaolo and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to Tot Watchers, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a Help desk, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing?

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! UtherSRG (talk) 12:37, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Huh? But red links are not allowed. I hate seeing red links on a page. ValePari Dipaolo (talk) 14:43, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

From Redlinks: Red links for subjects that should have articles but do not, are not only acceptable, but needed in the articles. They serve as a clear indication of which articles are in need of creation, and encourage it. Only remove red links if you are certain that Wikipedia should not have an article on that subject. I'm sorry you don't like them. But your dislike of something is much less important than our policies and standards. - UtherSRG (talk) 00:54, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

I'll probably just keep them. I don't care. ValePari Dipaolo (talk) 10:29, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

November 2023

Hello, I'm Geraldo Perez. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Cinderella II: Dreams Come True have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. See messages at your IP account User talk:5.180.207.104:

See WP:INDISCRIMINATE. A "crew" section with a list of non-notable people with minor roles in creating the film and likely copied from IMDb, adds no value to any film article. People with major roles are already mentioned in the article. WP:Manual of Style/Film for what goes in a film article. A "crew" section with a list of non-notable people with minor roles in creating the film, no matter where it is sourced from, is not one of the items listed as belonging in a film article.

You have added this content to the article multiple times using your IP accounts. Editors have correctly removed it but you are persisting. If you think you have an argument for going against the manual of style for this article, start a discussion on the article's talk page and make your case there and get a consensus to add it before adding it to the article yet again. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:27, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Cinderella II: Dreams Come True, you may be blocked from editing. As before, that is not appropriate content Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:19, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

What? Am I disrupting this site, Mr. Perez? Hmm. But I still want to put most of the credits in the article I'm editing. :-) And also, I'm signed in. ValePari Dipaolo (talk) 21:24, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Take it to the article talk page. What you want to do is inappropriate for a film article. Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:01, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Cinderella II: Dreams Come True. As before Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:02, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

New message from Geraldo Perez

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Cinderella II: Dreams Come True § Crew listing in article. Make your case on the talk page of the article as to why you feel it necessary to include this trivia in the article Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:24, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

November 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing and currently being blocked from editing as 2001:B07:A2A:4191:803E:CE34:671D:1E08/64.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 07:04, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  UtherSRG (talk) 13:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

OMG! You blocked me! Will you unblock me, please? I promise that I won't disrupt Wikipedia anymore, Mr. Perez! ValePari Dipaolo (talk) 13:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

HEY!!! HELP!!! PLEASE UNBLOCK ME, MR. PEREZ!!! PLEASE!! ValePari Dipaolo (talk) 13:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

I have been blocked. I tried to send an unblock request but nobody accepts it! Can you unblock me please? And here's the reason:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ValePari Dipaolo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Wanting to keep editing Wikipedia 109.53.28.74 (talk) 13:44, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 14:40, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

109.53.28.74 (talk) 13:44, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Your block includes your talk page since you have abused your talk page editing privileges. As indicated above, you will need to review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. The IP you used to post here has now also been blocked. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:27, 11 December 2023 (UTC)