Udgikerian
|
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Orthostatic vital signs, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://enw.org/Research-Orthostatic.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:16, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
Copyright problem: Orthostatic vital signs edit
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Orthostatic vital signs, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://enw.org/Research-Orthostatic.htm, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Orthostatic vital signs and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Orthostatic vital signs, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Orthostatic vital signs with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Orthostatic vital signs. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Orthostatic vital signs saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! VernoWhitney (talk) 12:58, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
- While it is not a word-for-word-copy, the article is still a close paraphrase and requires further rewriting to avoid violating copyright. VernoWhitney (talk) 12:58, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
Copyright policy on Wikipedia edit
Hi. In addition to what VernoWhitney says above and at his talk page, I just wanted to clarify that we don't wait for complaint before addressing copyright issues for several reasons, not the least of which is that our content is reproduced widely and almost instantaneously around the world. If we display content we don't legally have a right to, we stand a chance to significantly injure the copyright holder (who loses control of his intellectual property) and the downstream users (any of whom may be legally required to remove the content, sometimes at great expense if it's been published in text). We also put the project in legal jeopardy, which none of us want. For this reason, importing content that has been previously published is forbidden by the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use.
Rewriting content to avoid close paraphrase can be a challenge. Most helpful is to use more than one source, as you can take information (not text) from each and more easily blend them into a new creation. I happened to have a bit of extra time this morning, so I went ahead and did just that at Talk:Orthostatic vital signs/Temp. You are certainly welcome to contribute further to that page, which will probably be used to replace the original after the copyright processing period (typically a week) is closed.
Though you've been registered for almost a month, you don't seem to have been hit with the standard welcome notice. I myself found it quite useful, so I'm going to tuck it at the top of your page.
Welcome, and if you have any questions about this, please feel free to come by my talk page. I will be traveling for a few weeks after Thursday, but the offer remains open. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:15, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Viral syndrome edit
An article that you have been involved in editing, Viral syndrome, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viral syndrome. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. UtherSRG (talk) 09:39, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
The article Joint Derangement has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chzz ► 09:53, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Colonel Amiruddin edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Colonel Amiruddin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Zachlipton (talk) 09:08, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- Hi, I've declined that speedy deletion as the article clearly asserts importance, however as a matter of respect to the people we write articles about all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article. So I've replaced the speedy deletion process with a slower process to allow you time to add references such as newspaper reports about him.
- For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ϢereSpielChequers 13:19, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Invite to WikiConference India 2011 edit
| Hi Udgikerian,
The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011. But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach. As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions. We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011 |
|---|
Speedy deletion nomination of Mushtaq Khan edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Mushtaq Khan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Osarius : T : C : Been CSD'd? 10:04, 16 August 2011 (UTC)