Typom

Typom, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Typom! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Mz7 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:03, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
676		Hamilton, Bermuda (talk)	Add sources
191		Captive insurance (talk)	Add sources
771		Reinsurance (talk)	Add sources
5,083		Bermuda (talk)	Add sources
147		Catastrophe bond (talk)	Add sources
14		Ken Furphy (talk)	Add sources
53		Economy of Bermuda (talk)	Cleanup
8		Crown of Shadows (talk)	Cleanup
5		Amomum ovoideum (talk)	Cleanup
19		Bermuda–United States relations (talk)	Expand
14		2009–10 Watford F.C. season (talk)	Expand
10		2007–08 Watford F.C. season (talk)	Expand
358		Insurance in India (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
2,692		Spring (season) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
15		Health impact of light rail systems (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
213		ACE Limited (talk)	Merge
432		Insurance policy (talk)	Merge
27		No Trouble Found (talk)	Merge
6		2005 Spanish motorcycle Grand Prix (talk)	Wikify
126		Computer fan control (talk)	Wikify
2		Bicycle Madness (talk)	Wikify
7		Arglabin (talk)	Orphan
3		Analysis of partial differential equations (talk)	Orphan
3		Andreas Tsiatinis (talk)	Orphan
5		Bermuda Form (talk)	Stub
5		Ron Gray (footballer) (talk)	Stub
49		1984 FA Cup Final (talk)	Stub
16		Somerset Village, Bermuda (talk)	Stub
24		Ironshore (talk)	Stub
2		189th Division (2nd Formation)(People's Republic of China) (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:50, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Watford Re

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Watford Re requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- Dane ^talk 22:26, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bernard Charbonneau (September 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Typom/Bernard Charbonneau and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 14:02, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bernard Charbonneau has been accepted

Bernard Charbonneau, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

jcc (tea and biscuits) 23:35, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Thank you! Typom (talk) 15:33, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Ellis statements

Hi! I would speak more about quoting Judge Ellis pertaining to the Manafort sentencing, if you have questions. It's a detail best left unsaid, as it only distracts. Saying those details without quoting the judge is a different matter. Quoting the judge implies conclusive merit to the statement in the context of the verdict, and that's untrue. The citation of this statement by the President in a deceptive manner makes this matter more serious and interesting today on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcfnord (talk • contribs) 22:09, 10 March 2019 (UTC)