Tsuyoshiyasuda

November 2012

Hello, I'm Jamesooders. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Maasai people, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, James'ööders 09:19, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Maasai people. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Maasai people was changed by Tsuyoshiyasuda (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.972193 on 2012-11-26T09:21:18+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:21, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Samsara (FA • FP) 14:42, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sowing may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {distinguish|sewing}}==> Needle through thread.
• Seed cleaning is done especially with fruit (as the flesh of the fruit around the seed can quickly become prone to attack from insects or

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:15, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

May 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sex has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Sex was changed by Tsuyoshiyasuda (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.983104 on 2014-05-06T12:54:06+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:54, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kojo. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Kojo was changed by Tsuyoshiyasuda (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.965384 on 2014-05-06T12:55:39+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:55, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 22:19, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tsuyoshiyasuda (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I will make sure not to do vandalism anymore. I will respect Wikipedia. Please unblock me. Tsuyoshiyasuda (talk) 10:20, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

• Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
• Read our guide to improving articles
• Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
• If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:

1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
    • do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}});
    • do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]);
    • do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]);
    • do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
3. Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), place at the end of the prose you copied this template {{reflist-talk}} and then save.

• Now, edit that content to propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
• When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
  • If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 20:47, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Non-administrator observation) I (somewhat) support you being unblocked, because you have made some constructive contributions. If you are unblocked, I recommend that you go to the sandbox for some of your edits. There you can write "Hi" and "LOL" all you want. Anon126 (notify me of responses! / talk / contribs) 22:11, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tsuyoshiyasuda (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have knowledge of numerous things that are going around on Wikipedia. I will be able to make constructive edits on pages and can improve many pages of the Wikipedia community. I am very glad to be a part of this community, and I wish to continue being part of it. I would like to regain trust from this important community. I understand what I was blocked for and promise that I will never vandalize pages and abuse editing rights again.

Decline reason:

You have been offered a route back to editing via the WP:SECONDCHANCE process, above. Yunshui ^雲_水 11:48, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.