Tristan Lall
Review of article edit
Hi,
I'm really sorry, but I'm dropping the class and won't be writing the article you signed up to review :(.
Multipleaccess (talk) 07:45, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
- Not a problem. Sorry to hear you're leaving. Tristan Lall (talk) 07:58, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Review of article edit
Hi Tristan! Is your article up yet? Qqz(talk)
- The article is live at United States v. Spy Factory, Inc.. (Note the slightly different title than was originally listed.) I'll be expanding it quite a lot soon, so I wouldn't bother trying to add much detail (unless you really want to). Go ahead and make your review against the checklist (but note that the article is not sectioned because I intend much of the content that exists now to form the eventual lead section). It looks eligible for WP:DYK, but I'd suggest waiting a little while before nominating, just so I can expand it more fully. Tristan Lall (talk) 09:35, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi Tristan! Are you going to make any more edits to your article, or should I go ahead with DYK? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.170.239.156 (talk) 05:15, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Satyam Infoway Ltd. v. Sifynet Solutions Pvt. Ltd. edit
Hello! Your submission of Satyam Infoway Ltd. v. Sifynet Solutions Pvt. Ltd. at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 19:50, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Satyam Infoway Ltd. v. Sifynet Solutions Pvt. Ltd. edit
 | On 14 March 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Satyam Infoway Ltd. v. Sifynet Solutions Pvt. Ltd., which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Satyam Infoway Ltd. v. Sifynet Solutions Pvt. Ltd. dealt with the confusion of an unwary Internet user of "average intelligence and imperfect recollection"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Satyam Infoway Ltd. v. Sifynet Solutions Pvt. Ltd.. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 15:11, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
DYK nomination of United States v. Spy Factory, Inc. edit
Hello! Your submission of United States v. Spy Factory, Inc. at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Ishtar456 (talk) 22:13, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
DYK for United States v. Spy Factory, Inc. edit
| | On 29 March 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article United States v. Spy Factory, Inc., which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that until its conviction for trafficking in wiretapping equipment, the Spy Factory was the largest chain of spy shops in the United States? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/United States v. Spy Factory, Inc..You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Wikipedia Education Program Student Survey edit
Hi! Please take a few minutes to fill out this survey about the Wikipedia Education Program. This is our opportunity to improve the program and resources we provide students, so your feedback and input is integral to our future success. Thank you so much! JMathewson (WMF) (talk) 19:25, 21 May 2012 (UTC)