Welcome!

edit

Hello, Tonyepierce, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Tony E. Pierce, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! SwisterTwister talk 06:45, 28 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Tony E. Pierce

edit
 

The article Tony E. Pierce has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. SwisterTwister talk 06:45, 28 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Tony E. Pierce for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tony E. Pierce is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony E. Pierce until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Pichpich (talk) 02:03, 5 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Can you please not delete my article??? I was only trying to help Number One With A Bullet with the picture .jpg from a movie poster's web page. I didnt' think I was causing my article some harm with possible deletion.

If you have a policy-based reason for keeping the article around, feel free to add your thoughts at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony E. Pierce. That's where the decision whether to keep or not will be made. DoriTalkContribs 00:53, 13 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

September 2012

edit

  Hello, I'm Swatjester. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony E. Pierce, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, SWATJester Son of the Defender 20:56, 2 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony E. Pierce with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SWATJester Son of the Defender 21:57, 2 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. SWATJester Son of the Defender 21:59, 2 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
The above block is for repeatedly editing a closed archive to remove yours and others comments, despite the page saying not to and being warned repeatedly not to do so. SWATJester Son of the Defender 21:59, 2 September 2012 (UTC)Reply