User talk:Tommi1986/Archive Jul21

Hello there! I was the one who edited your page for the Home Alone Video games!

I hope i didn't make any screw ups or anything since i am very new to this but i got in contact with one of the developers of the home alone NES game and here's the tweet https://twitter.com/RandalLinden/status/1413420942898782209?s=20 and since i was led the word out about the development time and the horrible time they had to develop it! If this isn't good enough then that's fine! Hope you have a good day sir! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Valdemar64 (talk • contribs) 18:44, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi there, thanks for the message, unfortunately on Wikipedia we rely on what we call reliable sources (you can read more here WP:RS. Twitter, YouTube, Facebook posts etc. are not generally accepted as reliable sources. It's great you have chosen to begin edit Wikipedia, but I recommend you read through the policies and if you have any other questions or queries please feel free to leave me a message or pop by the Teahouse! Happy editing Tommi1986 ^{let's talk!} 21:34, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Boppin'B (July 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Boppin'B and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Boppin'B, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 11:05, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Tommi1986! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 11:05, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

GDP of Kolkata

I noticed you . You also Changed about Kolkata's economy ..... So I request you please Change the correct economy of Kolkata it is PPP $256 Billion & it's 3rd richest City in India $ South Asia after Mumbai & Delhi Aksh2000 (talk) 05:00, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

When reliable sources are cited then the changes can be made, making the changes with out reliable sources will be reverted. Tommi1986 ^{let's talk!} 08:20, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Tommi1986, it looks like the user again made an unsourced change on Economy of Kolkata, can you check this edit? Shubhrojeet (talk) 03:41, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Hey @Shubhrojeet: I have reverted back to previous version, and it seems @EdJohnston: has indeff protected page. Thanks for letting me know and if you notice it again gimme a shout!! Have a good day! Tommi1986 ^{let's talk!} 07:46, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Tommi1986, thanks for your help. Can you please check this similar edit as well on Kolkata? The GDP is again changed to an inflated false number. Reliable sources like Brookings Institution states it as $60.447 billion.[1] Shubhrojeet (talk) 00:02, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

The GDP of Kolkata to $60.447 billion dollars on the basis of the course provided by Shubhrojeet. However, the link of https://www.brookings.edu/research/global-metro-monitor/ (which was given as reference), provided the GDP of cities in 2013 - 14, About 7 years ago. Even then, (in the year 2013) Kolkata had a GDP higher than Bengaluru and Chennai, it being the third largest city economy in India. We are in a situation of comparing Kolkata GDP in 2013 to Bangalore and Chennai GDP of a much later year, thereby calling Kolkata the 5th largest economy. The reliability of the source had dimished over time. Please revert to the original data before the edit by Shubhrojeet. Aditya Roychowdhury - Periodic Table (talk) 04:36, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Hey I can see you remove something from Wikipedia page about Novo Nordisk so please take a look on this side and se what is written about on this website right here and I know this is the Danish Wikipedia website but maybe you can find some useful stuff here and and maybe there are some other websites and links here and there are always Google, The Internet to find some things or maybe some new stuff too and maybe you can Google to find something about The Novo Nordisk Maybe try on English or maybe on Danish too as well you must have a very good day/evening/night take care https://da.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novo_Nordisk