Tlaine198

Your submission at Articles for creation: S.U.F Helsinki (January 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:S.U.F Helsinki and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 13:43, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Tlaine198! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 13:43, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:S.U.F Helsinki

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:S.U.F Helsinki, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Qcne (talk) 13:43, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. JBW (talk) 20:47, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi

Thanks for the feedback!

As mentioned in my page, i have a "conflict of interest" for this article. My good friend is working with SUF Helsinki and he asked if i can create wiki page for them.

I understand that the first draft was way too promotional (that i made last week) and i tried to make this new one as neutral as i can, obviously failing at it. Sorry about that.

Intention behind this is however good and i'm just trying to create informative wikipedia page that might help someone searching information about this brand.

If you have any suggestions on how to make it (even?) less promotial any advice is highly appreciated. If not, then i will leave this be - study more about writing proper wikipedia articles and hope that someone else decides to write about SUF Helsinki.

Thank you!

- Timo Tlaine198 (talk) 10:43, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Tlaine198

I think you may have Wikipedia backwards. We only have articles about topics that we deem are notable, and the contents of the article should be summarised or paraphrased from reliable, secondary, independent sources. You should therefore find those sources first, and then write the article based off the sources.

Writing for Wikipedia is difficult: because you should only be paraphrasing those sources it is important to keep the language dry, neutral, almost like an autopsy report. Check out WP:NPOV and WP:PEACOCK. Qcne (talk) 15:33, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Hi,

Thank you for your reply. Trying to put it into words; one should be interested about the topic, but still - preferably - have no opinion about it. Tlaine198 (talk) 05:30, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Exactly, yes. That can be quite difficult if you are close to the subject! Qcne (talk) 07:53, 16 February 2024 (UTC)