ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

I've asked before and you evaded the question edit

This you? Volunteer Marek 18:05, 25 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

No. The Kaiser and late 19th century is who started destroying Germany and Poland, just as a remark. --Tino Cannst (talk)

Disambiguation link notification for March 16 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of place names of German origin in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 16 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 28 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Żuławy Wiślane, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Werder.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 28 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

For your wonderful contributions edit

  The Polish Barnstar of National Merit, 1st Class
For your wonderful contributions to history of the region.
this WikiAward was given to Tino Cannst by VikingDrummer (talk) on 07:01, 18 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

VikingDrummer (talk) 07:01, 18 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Request, Piast Canal edit

Greeting! Can you please post at Talk:Piast Canal relevant quotations from the sources[1][2] you added? A quote in German is also good, also Musekamp should probably be cited as Zwischen Stettin und Szczecin: Metamorphosen einer Stadt von 1945 bis 2005, because I am assuming you are citing the German book (I don't see an English translation).VikingDrummer (talk) 07:06, 18 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Request, Lubusz Land edit

I requested at Talk:Lubusz Land#Quote request that you provide a quotation from the source and clearer attribution, as it is raised on the article history page.VikingDrummer (talk) 07:47, 3 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

@VikingDrummer: will do by end of this week --Tino Cannst (talk) 20:18, 8 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
Thanks mate.VikingDrummer (talk) 06:22, 9 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Stan Tincon per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stan Tincon. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- RoySmith (talk) 22:38, 24 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for June 3 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Riga State Gymnasium No.1, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages German and Russian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:32, 3 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Polonization of Eastern Germany (1945–1990) for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Polonization of Eastern Germany (1945–1990) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polonization of Eastern Germany (1945–1990) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:21, 20 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Unexplained reverts on edits and article deletions. edit

I do not understand why many of your edits, which are also properly cited, are kept being removed under the guise of POV, such as this one, which is WP:BABY, also your article, Polonization of Eastern Germany (1945–1990) was deleted, even though it was an impressively cited article. Someone claimed they couldn't find anybody named Siebel-Achenbach, but a single internet search, titles "Siebel-Achenbach" (I use DuckDuckGo, but that doesn't make any difference), revealed the top 3 links to be in order for top to bottom his profile at the University of Waterloo, the book you were likely citing and a review of the book in The American Historical Review. Admittedly, you forgot to include him in the literature section, but you could've added that during the deletion request. Also, everyone claimed POV but didn't give any examples, and called it forks of smaller article sections. Although I have a few suggestions for you, 1. How about full citations or SFNs? 2. Change the article's name from Polonization of the Former Eastern Germany (1918-1990), the former change to stop any confusion between the DDR and the Former Eastern Germany, and the change in the timeline because Poloinzation of German areas also took place during Interwar Poland, there's an excellent book about it The German Minority in Interwar Poland by Winson Chu. I would like to collaborate with you on the recreation of the article, if you let me edit your page User:Tino Cannst/Polonization of Eastern Germany (1945-1990). Crainsaw (talk) 14:22, 6 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Much appreciated!! Yes, let's collaborate on this. The delete discussion was clearly biased, but I will look into the particularly objected statements and provide e.g. more context for the statements; and I will start using full citations and SFNs - this will take time here, I have only few of the references in digital and OCR'ed version. Tino Cannst (talk) 15:49, 10 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
If you need more references, you can use the Wikipedia Library, if you have more than 6 months of editing and more than 500 edits you can use it to access all kinds of publishers from De Gruyter to Brill, Oxford and Cambridge publishing. And if you want a free OCR software, you can use your phone to photograph the pages, and then OCR them through the Google Lens mobile app. Crainsaw (talk) 16:13, 10 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Did you make this edit? Crainsaw (talk) 07:44, 11 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
No, clearly that was not me! Tino Cannst (talk) 18:20, 11 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Move edit

I moved the User:Tino Cannst/Polonization of the Former Eastern Germany (1918-1990) to Draft:Polonization of the Former Eastern Germany (1918-1990) so more editors can see and edit it, and when it's ready we'll move it into article mainspace. Crainsaw (talk) 17:14, 21 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

OK, perfect! Tino Cannst (talk) 17:15, 21 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

  1. ^ Peter Oliver Loew (2006). Recovered History on the Appropriation of the Past in the Interstices of Central Europe. Harrassowitz. pp. 300–309.
  2. ^ Jan Musekamp (2010). Between Szczecin and Szczecin, Metamorphoses of a City from 1945 to 2005. Harrassowitz Verlag.