Thereeldeal
Hello, Thereeldeal, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
- Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments. You can sign your post like I did by using 4 tildes (
~~~~), which will leave your username and time you posted the comment. - The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- Simplified Ruleset
- How to edit a page
- Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
- Picture tutorial, which can be very useful later.
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
- Wikipedia Glossary
- Check out Redwolf24's Bootcamp! Redwolf is a very friendly user, and this page might prove useful to you.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make mistakes at some point, here is what Wikipedia is not, which might help you out. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages, add a question to the village pump, or ask me. The Community Portal can also be very useful.
Happy editing! -Mysekurity(have you seen this?) 07:05, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
External links edit
All of your contributions thus far have been to insert links to movie reviews by Mark Sells of the Oregon Herald. Do you have a connection to Sells or to the Herald? android79 19:08, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
Yes. I am Mark. My contributions have been reviews and interviews with cast and crew.
- Then you may be interested in reading Wikipedia:External links#What should not be linked to, specifically #2. There's also a general prohibition against self-promotion or what some call "vanity" on Wikipedia. I don't think we could call it vanity in this case, since you appear to be a respected film critic and not just some guy with a website. It's also apparent to me that these are good-faith additions – you're not just trying to spam Wikipedia. However, I hope you understand that this is a bit of a conflict of interest, and that other editors may have a more negative reaction than I did. I'm going to ask around and see what the general consensus is on external links to film reviews.
- Oh, and you can automatically sign your posts on talk pages like this one by typing ~~~~. android79 14:31, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
Actually, I'll take that back. You have been spamming us: Special:Contributions/65.218.133.150. Don't do this again. android79 17:54, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
So, it's okay for film critics like Roger Ebert and A.O. Scott to post links to their reviews through Wikipedia but not for other critics? Please see "double standard."
- No, that's not okay, either. If you've got proof that either Ebert or Scott are actually doing this, I'm all ears. android79 19:33, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
Here are a few examples: Walk_the_line, Good_Night,_And_Good_Luck, Casablanca_(film), etc.
- You are missing the point. There's no evidence that Roger Ebert himself logged on to Wikipedia and added those links, and it's quite absurd to think that he did. For the first two movies, the links to Ebert's reviews were added by User:4.224.222.244 [1] and User:Mb1000 [2]. If you want to make the case that either of these two users is actually Ebert in disguise, go right ahead. As for Casablanca, Ebert's audio commentary from the DVD is used extensively as a source for the article. It would be hard to argue that a link to his review of that film does not belong there, even if he happened to do it himself. android79 15:58, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
Conflict of interest policy edit
Hello Thereeldeal. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.
Link information
|
|---|
|
Nomination of Mark Sells for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark Sells is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Sells until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:39, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
March 2011 edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:12, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
The file File:Msells BIO RR.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Uploaded for Mark Sells. No other use.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:37, 11 August 2022 (UTC)