Theo Jeffries

By The Way...

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sandy Fields, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

TheSavageNorwegian 14:47, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Delta Alpha

A tag has been placed on Delta Alpha requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadioFan (talk) 16:54, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Delta Alpha

An article that you have been involved in editing, Delta Alpha, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delta Alpha. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. NYCRuss ☎ 15:45, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandy Fields

Please do not blank the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandy Fields page. That will not prevent the discussion from occurring. If you have sources or information to add that relate to the player's notability, feel free to add them to the discussion instead. --Onorem♠Dil 20:52, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you may be blocked from editing. --Onorem♠Dil 03:55, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Sandy Fields for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sandy Fields is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandy Fields (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SarahStierch (talk) 18:12, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Do NOT re-create Sandy Fields again

If you re-create Sandy Fields again I will have you blocked permanently. You created Sandy Fields, which was then taken to a deletion review (here). The result was delete. You then re-created the article 6 months later knowing the community had deemed it non-notable. You also removed the deletion discussion from archives ([1] and here). I should have you immediately blocked regardless for this. I have added Sandy Fields to my watchlist and if it is re-created, you will never be able to edit Wikipedia again. Jrcla2 (talk) 13:28, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sandy Fields

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sandy Fields, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. SarahStierch (talk) 17:05, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Improper recreation of Sandy Fields

A tag has been placed on Sandy Fields requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. Jrcla2 (talk) 15:39, 30 December 2013 (UTC)