User talk:The Four Deuces/Archives/2013/September

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Tea Party movement closed

An arbitration case, in which you were named as party, has now closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

Pages related to the Tea Party movement, broadly construed, are placed under discretionary sanctions. This sanction supersedes the existing community sanctions.

The current community sanctions are lifted.

Goethean (talk · contribs), North8000 (talk · contribs), Malke 2010 (talk · contribs), Xenophrenic (talk · contribs), Arthur Rubin (talk · contribs), Ubikwit (talk · contribs), Phoenix and Winslow (talk · contribs) are indefinitely topic-banned from all pages relating to the Tea Party movement, broadly construed. This restriction may be appealed to the Arbitration Committee after no less than six months have passed from the closing of this case.

Collect (talk · contribs) is topic-banned from all pages relating to the Tea Party movement, broadly construed. This topic ban will expire after six months from the date this case is closed on.

Xenophrenic (talk · contribs) is indefinitely prohibited from interacting with, or commenting on, Collect (talk · contribs) anywhere on Wikipedia (subject to the ordinary exceptions).

Snowded (talk · contribs) and Phoenix and Winslow (talk · contribs) are indefinitely prohibited from interacting with, or commenting on, each other anywhere on Wikipedia (subject to the ordinary exceptions).

For the Arbitration Committee, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:03, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Ave atque vale

Per ArbCom -- except if you continue with any appeal actions, I will, of course, take part. Collect (talk) 12:05, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Thomas Jefferson question

I noticed your question about the Thomas Jefferson article had gone unanswered for three days, and although I don't recall ever posting at the neutrality noticeboard before, for some reason I felt compelled to offer my 2¢. Apologies if it's more hot air than you wished for. Cynwolfe (talk) 22:21, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/24.34.171.166

24.23.171.166, the IP who isn't signing, identified himself as mryan1451 in a post on the talk page today. Capitalismojo (talk) 00:13, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. TFD (talk) 00:23, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Jewish_Bolshevism

See what you think of this idea --BoogaLouie (talk) 15:56, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

rfc problem

i saw you answered on my rfc, i do not know who to ask so i can ask someone relevant, the rfc is shown on the rfc list but there is no question or text just my ip adress so do you know how to fix that? 90.129.66.38 (talk) 15:51, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

I have now added the text. TFD (talk) 17:18, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

American Exceptionalism

Hello! I just wanted to let you know that laissez-faireism is actually a legitimate word. See http://www.thefreedictionary.com/laissez-faireism http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/laissez-faireism and https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/laissez-faireism. In keeping with the rest of the sentence, laissez-faire should also have -ism appended to it. — Preceding signed comment added by Cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 03:45, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

It is a rarely used term and is defined as the "policy of laissez-faire." Since the sentence is about the contents of an ideology, the term would not be correctly used. Also, the sources say "laissez-faire", not "laissez-faireism." TFD (talk) 04:50, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

What I don't understand is

Why do you keep responding to him? You're not changing his mind. No one else is paying attention. If you stop responding then maybe he'll stop too. --Golbez (talk) 13:29, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Photo for the Soviet section of MkuCr

Are you ok with the current proposed caption for the photo, or are there changes you think are needed? The discussion didn't seem to come to any kind of conclusion on that point, and I don't want to just assume silent consensus. AmateurEditor (talk) 00:13, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

"Plaque of the Memorial about Repression in USSR at Lubyanka Square. The memorial was erected in the USSR by the human rights group Memorial in remembrance of 40,000 innocent people shot in Moscow under Stalin." I do not know why you would pick this remembrance which does not specifically mention Communism unlike the 2002 Saint Petersburg one which does. TFD (talk) 11:55, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

I did not pick the photo, Smallbones did. Thanks for your suggested caption. I'll post it to the article talk page. AmateurEditor (talk) 23:04, 28 September 2013 (UTC)