TheJimiZappa

Welcome!

Hello, TheJimiZappa, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Getting Started
• Introduction to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! S.G.^(GH) _ping! 11:21, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pamela Woods

The article Pamela Woods has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:01, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Reply=

Hi, thanks for email. Hi, thanks for message. You can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~~~~. Please add your messages to the bottom of the talk page, or they may be overlooked. I deleted your article because

• it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. It is now Wikipedia policy that biographical articles about living people must have independent verifiable references, as defined in the link, or they will be deleted. Sources that are not acceptable include social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company claims or interviewing its management.
• it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: After a lifelong passion for plants...
• The article is about her, not to promote her book. There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections. that's particularly the case when it's linked to a glowing review of the book complete with publisher and price. At least you didn't link to Amazon.
• If you have a conflict of interest when editing this article, you must declare it. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that she is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Wikipedia:Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Wikipedia:Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.
• Not reasons for deletion, but you shouldn't bold anything except the first occurrence of her name, and you should use wikilinks to other articles like Leigh, Greater Manchester

I'll restore the text. Please don't remove the prod notice until you have provided third-party refs as defined above. If you are not sure, leave it to me Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:33, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Put your references in the the text following the fact each supports using <ref>[url description]</ref>. Then {{reflist}} at the end will automatically generate a numbered list. Also for long docs like books and pdfs please give a page number in your ref. I have to say that for a medal winner I'm surprised that there appear no newspaper or magazines that mentioned her, if those are the only refs you could find Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:44, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheJimiZappa, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Twitbookspacetube 01:49, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at IL-2 Sturmovik: 1946, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Twitbookspacetube 06:10, 3 August 2017 (UTC)