User talk:TheBirdsShedTears/Archives/2020/September

Help request regarding Draft:Codacy

Hi TheBirdsShedTears,

I was trying to edit the page Draft:Codacy to address the concerns you identified (namely, the fact that it is undersourced and has a WP:COI), before submitting it through a WP:AFC process. However, I noticed that the page is now salted and I need help from an administrator to be able to create it.

I understand that the user CleanCode2020 who originally created the page moved it to the main namespace repeatedly before the page being ready for publishing, but I would like to work on improving the page until it is good to be submitted for approval. In the meanwhile I already added the necessary templates Template:Connected_contributor_(paid) and Template:Connected_contributor to the Draft talk:Codacy page.

Would you be able to help?

Thank you,

Prcr (talk) 31 August 2020 —Preceding undated comment added 15:30, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Prcr, I have nothing to do with your page. You can request help by adding {{Help me}} template to your talk page. As far as i know, writing for a COI page is a waste of time. Please visit WP:5P for future reference. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 15:44, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

TheBirdsShedTears, thank you for your reply and for the pointers. I have actually added the template {{Edit protected}} to the talk page, as I just need help with creating the (now protected) page. Paulo Ribeiro 16:01, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

September 2020

Hello, I wanted to leave a quick note about CSD. If your CSD requests are not accepted, it can count against you especially if your AFC privileges are subject to review. For instance at Natrang Theatre Group the copy-vio was a single paragraph which could easily be re-written (and revdel if necessary) and has now been removed and the earwig tool detects 0.0% CV. Might need a revdel though still. At Syed Mansoor Naqvi, A7 should not apply as there is a definite credible claim of significance. The advertising-type content is a different matter and that has now been removed to some extent, anyway. Cheers. Eagleash (talk) 08:51, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Zenati (music producer) article

Hello. I see that you requested this wiki to be put up for speedy deletion. This article is not meant to be a straight promotion, but to share with people, this artist I found. The main purpose is to share information about it and interest new people. Like Knxwledge or Madlib. Instead of having it be deleted, could you help me in terms of having the article look right (to the standards for no deletion) and reconsider please? I’d be very grateful. ZNTEAI (talk) 14:52, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

ZNTEAI, your page appears unambiguous advertising or promotion. Please read the following guidelines for future reference:

1. WP:MOSWTW
2. WP:NPOV
3. WP:V
4. WP:BIO
5. WP:AB
6. WP:INLINECITE

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 15:01, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello. Could you restore this and sned it back to me so I can continue making edits to it please.ZNTEAI (talk) 17:35, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

ZNTEAI, If the page in question passes general notability criteria, WP:ENT or WP:FILMMAKER, please refer to WP:REFUND.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 17:52, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Donald Nash has been accepted

Donald Nash, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 22:16, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Please don't redirect this page

Hello TheBirdsShedTears, I am ProRavan Official I was giving all right information about the Pyaar Ki Luka Chuppi page which you redirect that. Please I request revert my Changes on this page Thank You. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ProRavan Official (talk • contribs) 05:29, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Masti 84, I have provided the reason here. You can still improve your article by providing independent reliable sources while AfD is underway. Thank you! TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 13:38, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Why Nomination of OAK Entertainments for deletion

why sir... Nomination of OAK Entertainments for deletion

New page reviewer granted

Hi TheBirdsShedTears. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

• Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
• If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
• Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 07:53, 27 September 2020 (UTC)