User talk:TheAmazingPeanuts/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

SPI

Thanks for email. I tend not to get involved with SPI discussions; if I see an obvious sock while editing, I'll block the account on the spot, otherwise I tend to leave it to the regulars on that page. Is there any particular reason you want me to intervene? Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:32, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

@Jimfbleak: I never sent you an email, but I feel free to comment on the issue. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 15:36, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

I didn't try to make disruptive edits

On one album I tried to change it to Jacques Webster II, because he is the 2nd. His dad is the first. He said that. And the Nav discography page they are singles that he featured on . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.17.32.189 (talk) 20:05, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

@198.17.32.189: Okay, now I understand but slow down. Do you realize that you adding unsourced content in articles? Which is disruptive editing. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 20:14, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Yes, I understand now. Sorry for the late reply. I also created a page for Virgo World. I cited all my sources on the page. I just need help to add the album artwork as the image. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.17.32.189 (talk) 14:22, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

@198.17.32.189: Glad you taking I advice, but however the sources you added such as Twitter are not reliable sources, if you create an article make sure the sources are reliable. There is a list of reliable sources at WP:ALBUMSOURCE. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 17:54, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Death Race for Love and LND

Hello,

I am writing to let you know that both of my revisions were actually correct. Rvssian is credited on the updated track list on DRFL since the vinyl release and this is also reflected on the Spotify track list. Also, Polo G technically is not credited at all anymore on any track lists of LND on any services. Sickpanda42 (talk) 04:28, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

@Sickpanda42: I just check the credits and you're are right. The credits have been updated, sorry for the mistake. Next time use edit summaries where you added content, that way you won't get reverted by other editors in the future. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 04:37, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

@Sickpanda42: I look at the CD version of LND and Polo G is credited on the album. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 04:48, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

@Sickpanda42: You added this source in LND, but there is a note that says: "Track listing on back of gatefold has 'Man of the Year (999)' on side D, but this song is not on the record". That pretty much implies that "Man of the Year (999)" doesn't exist and it was an error on the cover. This is why we don't use Discogs as an reliable source because it is user-submitted/uploaded content that should be avoided per WP:ALBUMAVOID. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 00:46, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

@Sickpanda42: Don't remove my comment at my talk page. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 01:59, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

It was a limited pressing sold on the club 999 website. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ElG748EW0AA8xF7.jpg

This is the cover art for the "Eternal Purple" vinyl disk. https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/sxQAAOSwm8hfUeiW/s-l500.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sickpanda42 (talk • contribs) 02:03, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

@Sickpanda42: This don't have anything to do what I said in my previous comment, you are ignoring the issue here. The source you added in the article says it have an error in the back cover and the song doesn't exist. I am wasting my time talking to you with this because it's obvious that you are adding incorrect information in the article, you been warned in your talk page by adding incorrect information in articles is considered disruptive. These images from Discogs doesn't prove anything. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 02:39, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

hi

hi. Dondawithchild 20:42, 22 October 2020 (EST)

@Dondawithchild: If you here to tell me why I reverted your edits because websites such as Rate Your Music and The Needle Drop are classified as unreliable sources per WP:ALBUMAVOID. Since you appears to be new here, I advise you to look at the list of reliable sources (WP:ALBUMSOURCE). TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 21:17, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

nahh dw u were right about all that stuff ahaha, youtube reviews by critics for example, are not reliable sources. i just to this page because felt like saying hi

@Dondawithchild: You don't need to ping me at my talk page, I can see the message. And of course hi to you as well. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 03:12, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi Lindsayaustin (talk) 09:49, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

FYI

I have resigned as an admin and am no longer active on the project. Email notifications are turned off so I only just got your pings when I logged in for some housekeeping. Pings are unlikely to be received in any kind of timely manner if at all. I apologize for any inconvenience. -Ad Orientem (talk) 05:43, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

@Ad Orientem: I already know that you have retired from Wikipedia, I was just mentioned your name because I was reporting problematic editors, I didn't think you would respond to them at all. Sorry about that. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 05:55, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

No worries. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:45, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Emergency Tsunami

So I am new here and I created the article Emergency Tsunami. Turns out you don’t like my edits. I wanna be the first one to create it, so is there anyway that can happen? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.24.23.56 (talk) 07:41, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

@192.24.23.56: That's a lie. You are not new and know what you doing. Next time read WP:NSONG and WP:SPS and stop creating articles without reliable sources. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 07:58, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Archive tool

I recall you added archive links to Jimmy Lee (album) a while ago. I thought you might find this site -- archive.today -- more useful, since it takes snapshots in the manner of (the now-discontinued) WebCite. I'm using it now for Love for Sale (Bilal album), realizing how precious the link availability will be for the article to sustain. isento (talk) 07:04, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

@Isento: I been using archive.today a lot more then Internet Archive lately, because I realized that Internet Archive have a lot more errors then archive.today does and it doesn't work on every website. So I personally prefer archive.today over Internet Archive. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 07:46, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks a lot

Thanks a lot for adding the personnel to Shoot for the stars, aim for the moon. I want to bring the article to GA, and possibly FA. It would have been a pain in the ass to put down all that info. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 21:52, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Speaking about FA. Would you like to bring the album to featured article status with me? It would be amazing to have help from an amazing editor like yourself. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 21:54, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

@The Ultimate Boss: That wasn't me who added the personnel section in the article, it was another editor [1]. But I did added the release history section [2]. I think it would be easier for you to just focus on making the article in GA status, getting the article in FA status is a little bit harder. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 22:27, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Shoot for the Stars, Aim for the Moon

I need your opinion. Do you think Shoot for the Stars, Aim for the Moon is ready for FAC? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shoot for the Stars (talk • contribs)

@Shoot for the Stars: I think the article look good, but I think you need to focus on other articles such as "Make It Rain" and "My Future". TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 20:36, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Life of Pablo

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Life of Pablo has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

A couple of thoughts. This section-

He released The Life of Pablo for streaming on February 14, 2016, following a performance on Saturday Night Live (SNL).[23][24] After its official streaming release, West continued to tinker with mixes of several tracks, describing the work as "a living breathing changing creative expression".[25] Although a statement by West around the time of The Life of Pablo's release indicated it would be a permanent exclusive to Tidal, the album was released through several other competing services beginning in April 2016.[26] Before the release of The Life of Pablo, West had tweeted that it was a hip hop and a gospel album.[27] In an interview on Big Boy Radio, West said: "When I was sitting in the studio with Kirk, Kirk Franklin, and we're just going through it, I said this is a gospel album, with a whole lot of cursing on it, but it's still a gospel album.”

appears in the Background and Development section. This more properly belongs in the Post Release Updates section, and I would put all of it in the Promotion and Release section. Then everything is roughly in order.

The Adidas Yeezy Season 3 fashion show is mentioned three times. It should probably just be mentioned once at the most appropriate point in the article.

I'm not sure why there are five or six citations after the Taylor Swift "issue". Surely one or two quality publications would suffice?

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 19:31, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

@Twofingered Typist: Thanks for pointing out the issues. I would appreciate if you edited out these concerns for me. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 19:50, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

This is not really an editor's responsibility. You know the article's contents and are the one in the best position to know what should be moved and the appropriate order it should be in. If you want me to have a look at the article after you have made any changes, just let me know.

Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:04, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

@Twofingered Typist: I have made these changes in the article and remove the unnecessary content that you pointed out. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 22:55, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Pop Smoke

Dude I am honestly soooo happy that Pop Smoke won best rap album and best billboard 200 album today! Also really happy be won best new artist and best rap artist! You know I'm shooting for the stars, aiming for the moon 💫 (talk) 03:08, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

@Shoot for the Stars: That great for Pop Smoke to get those awards. While Shoot for the Stars, Aim for the Moon isn't one of my favorite albums of 2020, but I think it deserves to get a award. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 07:47, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Trap House III and studio albums

It is not listed as an album on Gucci Mane's discography page, but rather as a mixtape. Also, please revert all your edits you did to revert my edits. I clearly listed a source on Murder was the Case that it was unofficially released, so it is not an official studio album. Thank you. ThesePicklesLoveSosa (talk) 01:37, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

@ThesePicklesLoveSosa: What listed at Gucci Mane's discography page is incorrect. This source clearly says that Trap House III is Gucci Mane's eighth studio album not mixtape. We follow the sources, not discographies. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 02:02, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Besides that, could you please revert back your edits, since it is stated that Murder was the Case is an unofficial album? ThesePicklesLoveSosa (talk) 02:15, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

@ThesePicklesLoveSosa: I have revert the edits at the Murder was the Case article, also I suggest that you be more careful with your edits and use edit summaries when you removing content, some editors might take that as vandalism. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 02:39, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Meet the Woo 2

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Meet the Woo 2 has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Congratulations on attaining GA status for it.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 12:14, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

@Twofingered Typist: Okay, thanks for the help. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 12:22, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

@TheAmazingPeanuts: One thing I meant to mention—as the article developed it seems multiple citations were added for many sentences—sometimes three or four. As a rule, unless a statement is controversial one citation from a reputable source will do. More than that is Wikipedia:Citation overkill. If you decide you want to pursue FA status this will need to be fixed. Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:42, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

@Twofingered Typist: Done. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 07:18, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Hip hop edits

Hey man, can you help out with this? For the sake of the article, our readers, our legitimacy, etc. isento (talk) 02:58, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

@Isento: Looking at the editor's talk page history, I wouldn't be surprise that my edit get reverted. The editor have a history of personal attacks and edit warring. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 03:38, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

They'd be breaking 3RR and liable for a block if reported ... isento (talk) 03:41, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Why don't we all work together to fix this page. I will supply the all the sources to back up all my edits. If your interested in working collectively lets take this discussion to the Hip Hop talk page. I offered to do this in my first edit revert but it was rejected by @Isento:Robjwev (talk) 03:56, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Did you even look at the guidelines I cited to you earlier? Well, if not, here's another one: WP:FRINGE: "an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea." That's your idea, pal, not supported by any scholarship from what I'm seeing. isento (talk) 03:59, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

This response from you is either a ruse or an extremely sad case of denial. isento (talk) 04:01, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

@Robjwev: I advise you to take this discussion at this talk page instead of my. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 04:17, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Reverting of my edits concerning Norwegian chart placement for Birds in the Trap Sing McKnight

Why did you change my edits? I’ve followed the Norwegian music charts for years. PaskaSemmen113 (talk) 10:31, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

@PaskaSemmen113: This source does not support your change. Ss112 has warned you about this issue at your talk page several times before, don't update the Norwegian charts if you don't have a source to support it. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 10:41, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

What about this source? [3] This is another source which says it peaked at 17th when it returned to the charts. I want to resolve this if it’s possible. PaskaSemmen113 (talk) 10:48, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

@PaskaSemmen113: That's not the official chart for Norway, which is why we don't use it in the first place. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 11:19, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

It’s organized by IFPI Norway, and this chart is technically the same as the VG-lista, which also is organized by IFPI Norway. And the fact that the Hung Medien page lists 20th place as the peak of Birds in the Trap Sing McKnight is strange. If you look at that same page, where you find the weeks this album has charted, it says 17th one week (that week the album re-entered the chart) before jumping down to 20th. And this issue is bothering me, that the 20th place is listed on the article about the album, at the section about chart placements. PaskaSemmen113 (talk) 11:25, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

@PaskaSemmen113: I see your concerns after looking at this chart, it did peaked at number 17 on the chart last year. That could be an error. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 11:42, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Yep, that’s right. It was also listed on the official chart page here. Is it resolved, or will the 17th place be listed on the article about the album? PaskaSemmen113 (talk) 11:49, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

@PaskaSemmen113: Done. If you have any more concerns regarding charts in the future, I suggest you go to WT:CHARTS and start an discussion there. Sometimes it's the best way to avoid this kind of incidents with other editors. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 12:04, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

I’m really, really sorry for starting a discussion like that here, but thank you for resolving that issue! I’m definitely more accepted on the Norwegian Wikipedia which is my native language. Anyway, the most of the albums which appears on the Norwegian charts, I don’t see any chart placement concerns, because this is rare to me. PaskaSemmen113 (talk) 12:08, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

@PaskaSemmen113: That's okay. English Wikipedia is a lot different than yours, we have different set of guidelines. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 12:23, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Pages + history restored

Hey - I've moved back your user and user talk pages and their old history (I moved over your recreations, so some inconsequential recent history was lost there). I've applied page move protection to both for a bit ~TNT (she/they • talk) 09:36, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

@TheresNoTime: Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 09:45, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

WP:IGNORE is not a reason to edit war

Once your bold edit has been reverted, for whatever reason, you shouldn't be reverting again. Every track listing has this headline, and now you decide to take issue with it? What for? You wanted to get the current edit on the article so you made an unnecessary change to it. That's all it looks like. I usually agree with your edits, but I expected better out of you and you know better than to do this. I would suggest you don't go around disregarding BRD while citing IGNORE again. It's not going to fly with other users. Pretty sure there's an addendum somewhere that even says WP:IGNORE is not a license to edit war. Funny how you tell other users to follow BRD but you don't? Ss112 10:24, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

I also would suggest you familiarise yourself with the fact that MOS:ACCESS is a policy, and MOS:TABLECAPTION is an extension of that policy. You can find headlines "redundant" all you like, but it was decided by consensus on Wikipedia to have a caption describing what a table is for visually impaired readers, particularly those who use screen readers. WP:IGNORE says if a rule prevents you from improving Wikipedia to ignore it. Literally to whom is removing a headline in any way an "improvement"? Stop methodically going around to hip hop articles you follow/are interested in and removing these headlines. It does not matter if some other user said there's no point to them, since taking cue from more experienced users is how you've operated and based your edits on in the past. If that's the case, they were wrong for doing so. You'll find accessibility is a lot more important than "ignore all rules". Ss112 10:26, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

@Ss112: The reason why I remove the table caption because I have a minor discussion with an follow editor Throast about this issue. But I see your point and I will revert my edits, sorry for the inconvenience. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 10:49, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Donda Tidal source

The track listing and personnel sections adapt their contents from Tidal, not from the album as a primary source. Since the album itself is not sufficient as a source, a reference to the secondary source would be necessary in this case. Throast (talk | contribs) 21:57, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

@Throast: I somewhat agree that Tidal is a useful source for album credits but there's never been an discussion about this website, and some editors don't considered as reliable because it's a streaming service. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 22:18, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

If Tidal is unusable and no other secondary source to back up those credits can be found, we would have to remove the entire section because it is currently unsourced. Throast (talk | contribs) 23:12, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

@Throast: Just because the track listing or personal sections don't have a source for the album's credits doesn't make it unsourced, this is part of the guidelines (See WP:PERSONNEL). The album itself is considered the source for this kind of material, and other editors have considered it inappropriate to link to sources selling the album. While in a way it's good that you're citing a source in general, unless the material is contentious, like a sample or a credit that hasn't been provided in all places, there's no need to provide a Tidal link for the sections. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 23:52, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

I would like to remind you that when it comes to credits, Tidal is considered generally reliable and often used. --K. Peake 08:55, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

@Kyle Peake: Like I said before, I don't have anything against Tidal but there are other editors don't considered as an reliable source. I'm suggesting a consensus at WT:ALBUM or WP:RSN to avoid edit warring in the future. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 09:32, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

The issue is, if you remove the only source there is to back up the entire credits, technically, all of them would have to be removed because they would remain unsourced. As Kyle Peake says below, the album can't serve as a source in this case because it doesn't have any liner notes. As far as I can see, there's no consensus on whether or not Tidal is reliable or not. If you don't "have anything against" Tidal, why act on behalf of editors who do? If there are users claiming that Tidal is unreliable, can you link to a discussion? Throast (talk | contribs) 13:34, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

@Throast: I'm not interested in continuing this discussion here. I already said Tidal can be a useful source but not every editor is not gonna agreed with that, such as Ss112 who been removing Tidal off some articles recently [4] [5]. If you gonna have a discussion about the personal section being "unsourced" do it at WT:ALBUM, not at my talk page. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 14:29, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

MOS:ALBUM

Just so you are fully aware of what is behind my recent revert of your edit on Donda, MOS:ALBUM mentions under sourcing how "it is generally assumed that a personnel section is sourced from the liner notes" and the album does not have any liner notes. There is nothing against sourcing where these do not exist, also I am making sure to avoid any edit warring by posting this. --K. Peake 08:52, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Kyle Peake, thank you. Throast (talk | contribs) 13:23, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

WP:NOTBROKEN

Hi. I've just noticed some of the changes you made in this edit to Aaliyah were changing perfectly fine WP:NOTBROKEN redirects to the specific pages where they link. Just keep in mind: sometimes it's better to leave these alone. For example, Death of Aaliyah did not need to be repointed to 2001 Marsh Harbour Cessna 402 crash just to be "specific". In some cases there's nothing wrong with linking to a redirect and can in many cases be beneficial. Ss112 15:45, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Okay, I try to remember that. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 16:41, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Zayn Malik

Hi Roy. The user keeps on removing sourced genres from "‎Artistry and public image" section and replaced with new sources. [6] Thoughts? 183.171.115.99 (talk) 15:44, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Sock?

Do you think that Yayareabomb is a sock of Shoot for the Stars?--Bbb23 (talk) 16:21, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

@Bbb23: I have doubts that the editor is related to Shoot for the Stars because the edits don't look similar to me. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 16:42, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, you know far more about the subject area than I do.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:04, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Unorthodox Jukebox

Greetings, I checked multiple times the sources in the composition section of the article following your revert, and i still can't see some of the genres reported. Can you please tell me in what source and where exactly It says that it's a reggae album? Thank you --Morce Library (talk)

@Morce Library: While I prefer you should have this discussion at the article's talk page instead of here, but the source that called the album reggae is from this source. Maybe you can't see it because it's behind a paywall. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 20:56, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

My apologies Morce Library (talk) 22:31, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

@Morce Library: It's okay. You kinda new here, so I give you a break. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 23:31, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

After Hours (The Weeknd album)

Sorry about that. For some reason I thought Blinding Lights didn't reach the top, hence the edit I made. SkyWarrior 01:55, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

@SkyWarrior: That's alright, I made mistakes too sometimes. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 02:20, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Edits regarding Dawn FM

Thanks for your advice. It seems all out on sources in Composition! Quail & Metal (talk) 04:01, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

P.S. I'll be sure to be careful with whatever changes I make. Quail & Metal (talk) 04:03, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

@Quail & Metal: You're welcome, but you could have respond at your talk page instead here. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 04:26, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Dawn FM

Thank you so much for the information. Mannoragrace (talk) 23:13, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

@Mannoragrace: You're welcome. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 08:30, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Removal of DS4Ever Samples

The Samples I listed are correct, I do not know how to add a link to cite sources — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucasdissman (talk • contribs) 23:11, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

@Lucasdissman: If you can't found an reliable source that supported these clams, then don't add anything in the article at all, plain and simple. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 23:19, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Reminder to !vote at Talk:Kids See Ghosts (album)#Request for comment: "psychedelic" genre in infobox

Friendly reminder that you still need to !vote at the RfC you opened, if you have an opinion. ––FormalDude talk 01:38, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Humanz

I think it would be helpful to do the same for regarding genres. Would you mind to check that please? 113.210.52.34 (talk) 04:34, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Knife Talk's status as a single

Hello, commenting here as I've noticed "Knife Talk" was removed from the singles section on Certified Lover Boy. While I get the concern regarding unsourced material, not calling the song the 3rd official single is a bit erronous. It *is* getting an active push on Rhythmic and Urban radio - push that started around the same time the music video was released. However, not a single major outlet or industry source discussed the song *prior* to its impact, but are mentioning it *after* (see posts from AllAccess and HitsDD.)

Again, I get the concerns for lack of sourcing - however, it's hard to get by in this case considering the push *is* noticeable and documented in a way. I just wanted to bring this up here. Cheers! Toyota Impreza (talk) 12:34, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Year-end lists consensus

@TheAmazingPeanuts: Hi. I remember you initiating a consensus for shortening the critics' "year-end lists" for albums rankings to a maximum of 10. Would you please link me to that talk discussion? I am not able to find it. Thank You. ℛonherry☘ 03:27, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

@Ronherry: The discussion can be found at here. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 05:30, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

FAC for Late Registration

I thought you'd be interested to know that I have put this article up as a FAC, after you interacted with it while knowing I was in the midst of preparation and also commented when I had Kids See Ghosts up at FAC! --K. Peake 17:07, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

@Kyle Peake: Thanks for the notice, I will comment on it later. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 18:49, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

I look forward to seeing your comments shortly! --K. Peake 15:31, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi

Can you help me add the TBA thing at Drake discography? He has a new album out tonight. Thanks! PopLizard (talk) 22:13, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

@PopLizard: It look like somebody did it for me. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 22:22, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

FAC open

Hi! I've seen a lot of your exceptional contributions in the rap music department here. I was wondering if you could give your input at the FAC for "WAP". I'd be happy to do something in return, if you'd like (i.e. a peer or GA review). —VersaceSpace 🌃 02:23, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

@VersaceSpace: Normally, I prefer albums over songs but I take a look later. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 02:37, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Thank you. —VersaceSpace 🌃 02:38, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Talk:Born Pink#Genres

Hi. Do you mind to take a look at talk page? Feel free to comment. 121.121.168.191 (talk) 04:12, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Faith (Pop Smoke album)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Faith (Pop Smoke album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 22:41, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Faith (Pop Smoke album)

The article Faith (Pop Smoke album) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Faith (Pop Smoke album) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 00:02, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Talk:Anderson .Paak#RfC

Hi Robby. Do you mind to take a look at talk page? Feel free to comment. 2600:6C40:5400:5E68:F03D:9AF4:7A94:3D63 (talk) 00:49, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy FAC

Hello, I thought I'd inform you that this article is at FAC since you commented on my past two FACs! K. Peake 08:55, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

@Kyle Peake: I will comment on it later, sorry for the late reply. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Late Registration

Hello, I see that you have reverted my second edit today to the Late Registration article. While I do understand where you're coming from in your edit summary, I personally believe that Christgau's first name should be present there, since it is the first time it shows up in the reception section (perhaps I should have been more specific in that regard when I wrote "here" in my edit summary). I do not intend to reintroduce the edit, since you did give a valid rationale, but I thought I'd state that I believe his first name should be there in that specific instance, due to the fact that there is considerable distance in the article between these two mentions of his name (not to mention them being in different sections of the article). JeffSpaceman (talk) 01:39, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

@JeffSpaceman: I think you have a point there, since the article is lengthy, I think Christgau's first name should be present at the critical reception section, but it shouldn’t be linked (WP:REPEATLINK). TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 02:06, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

I've restored his first name in the critical reception section without the link. JeffSpaceman (talk) 02:35, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

@JeffSpaceman: Okay, thanks. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 04:18, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

After Hours page

Hey, I added a quote by The Weeknd on the character he played for After Hours but you removed it saying that the source doesnt mention the album. So I am giving you a link highlighting the section from where I picked it up: https://www.gq.com/story/the-weeknd-september-cover-interview#:~:text=For%20the%20entire,but%20The%20Weeknd%E2%80%99s. It very clearly talks about the character played by The Weeknd throughout After Hours. Please read the highlighted section and reconsider. Bhkkbey250 (talk) 16:51, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

@Bhkkbey250: I suggest you read Wikipedia:Manual of Style before you make any more edits because there are many errors with your edits. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 17:07, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Sorry for my mistakes, and thank you for restoring the edit

Also, can you explain why the Dawn FM edit was removed? You said its unsourced but I did give a source and NME is also a reliable source as far as I know. Bhkkbey250 (talk) 19:37, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

@Bhkkbey250: My mistake, I have reverted the edit. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 21:23, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Talk:The_Storm_Before_the_Calm#Euro_label

Share your thoughts regarding the album if you wish to. 2001:D08:2930:E566:3016:9A76:851F:F101 (talk) 10:28, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Hits Daily Double

How is HitsDaily not a source for album sales? It's on every A list artists discog page source wise...68.134.192.160 (talk) 06:39, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Discogs is not a reliable source either; it's user-generated (WP:USERG), and we prefer to use Billboard because album sales are a lot more accurate than on Hit Daily Double. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 07:56, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:BoxxyBoy reported by User:Amaury (Result: ). Thank you. Amaury • 08:46, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

Courtesy notice since I messed up the ping on your name the first time. Amaury • 08:46, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

@Amaury: Thanks. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 09:42, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

Outside - Travis Scott song credit update

Hello there, why did you remove the producer-Credit Nisi (Nishanth Thayaparan) on Birds In The Trap Sing Mc Night - Travis Scott when on Genius.com its stated that he produced it? https://genius.com/Travis-scott-outside-lyrics Stiiiizzzz (talk) 19:42, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

@Stiiiizzzz: That source is not reliable; it's user-generated. User-generated content is generally unacceptable (WP:USERG), and anyone can edit that page. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 22:51, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Well, its the truth at the end, if you want or not, theres a ton of social media posts etc of that time. Just say you dont know anything about the scene. And thanks for distorting History. Cheerz. Stiiiizzzz (talk) 18:18, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Aaliyah album

How come you’re listing the reissue track list as a digital exclusive version? That’s inaccurate, it was an initial physical reissue. It’s odd that you want to keep inaccurate information. Friendlyhelper9949 (talk) 09:53, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

@Friendlyhelper9949: Look, I've been on Wikipedia a lot longer than you, so don't tell me what is inaccurate. The article is a featured article, and featured articles need to have high-quality sources. The sources you added are not high-quality sources at all; they are questionable at best (see WP:NOTRSMUSIC). Plus, this source (that you seem to ignore) says the international digital edition bonus tracks were released in 2014, not 2004. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 12:15, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

well yeah, they must’ve finally put the physical reissue from 2004 onto iTunes. Blackground Records didn’t have many albums on iTunes. Friendlyhelper9949 (talk) 12:46, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Is there a reason you’re ignoring my source? and every other source i’ve sent in favor of that one about iTunes, something that wasn’t even available when the album and reissue first came out. Friendlyhelper9949 (talk) 04:17, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

the reissue is all over the internet just type in Aaliyah (2004 edition) Friendlyhelper9949 (talk) 04:19, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

@Friendlyhelper9949: All the sources you sent to the article are not reliable sources; you clearly did not read the guidelines (see WP:NOTRSMUSIC). TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 07:14, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

"Enemy"

I know you are mostly focused around the hip-hop genre of music, but would it make sense for me to edit so the Imagine Dragons & JID track "Enemy" is not listed as a single from the former's album, Mercury - Act 1? It is similar to the Weeknd's Earned It, which it was included on his album Beauty Behind the Madness, however not actually released as a single to promote that album. Asknaffffwiki (talk) 04:47, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

TLOP 'trap' genre

I understand removing it earlier, but I included citation to one of many credible authors who noted TLOP had elements of trap music in it's drums, lyrical content, and synth; as well as having features from artists like Young Thug, Metro Boomin and Ty Dolla Sign whos names are synonymous to the genre already. Can you clarify the problem you have with adding this to the page? Tronfa (talk) 23:13, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Either way, I read through WP:EXPLICITGENRE and evaluated my citation to fit your standards. I hope it can go without removal. Tronfa (talk) 23:53, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

@Tronfa: Just because the author says the album has trap elements doesn't explicitly mean it's a trap album. A source needs to explicitly label an album by a genre; elements don't count. And a source needs to be reliable, and this source you added to the article is not reliable whatsoever. College websites are frowned upon. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 02:40, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

‎Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums#Track template

Hey Roy. Would you like to take a look at the recent discussion for track listing template? If you have time, your comments are always appreciated. 2001:D08:2936:88FB:17AB:B51C:BC51:C36B (talk) 09:22, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy FA status

Hello there, it has been a while since I've been very busy working but I've recently nominated Kanye West's acclaimed 2010 album My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy for FA status after running through it again and as someone who did leave comments for my first ever FA Kids See Ghosts, I thought you may be interested in leaving some comments at the FAC. K. Peake 21:51, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

The article is back at FAC now, would you care to leave comments again please? --K. Peake 13:37, 18 March 2024 (UTC)