ThatBritishAsianDude

Your submission at Articles for creation: South Asians in the Netherlands (May 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:South Asians in the Netherlands and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Liance^talk 18:24, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your time, i will try to improve the article by adding more sources. It is however kind of hard to find sources about this specific subject that pass WP:VER. ThatBritishAsianDude (talk) 18:37, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Hello, ThatBritishAsianDude! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~Liancetalk 18:24, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

June 2024

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page South Asian Canadians has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. No, WP:OVERLINKING is not adding a source Meters (talk) 20:05, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I suppose you are referring to the edit you reverted and the summary i gave for that. What i meant with that edit summary was that it didn't fit in in what the source said, my fault for keeping it that short. I put it back with a longer edit summary. ThatBritishAsianDude (talk) 03:02, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in South Asian Canadians. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Stop overlinking. See MOS:DUPLICATELINK and MOS:OVERLINK Meters (talk) 03:49, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at South Asian Canadians shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Take your content dispute to the article's talk page and stop edit warring. You have been warned about edit warring before. Meters (talk) 06:32, 30 June 2024 (UTC)