Teh mite

well done for reverting the vandalism to the england rugby page. But in future it would be easier to undo or revert this vandalism rather than just delete it. happy editing. Noface1 15:08, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Digger.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Digger.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:15, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Digger dive.jpg

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Digger dive.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:34, 2 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. HermesBot 13:34, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:Rugby08boxcover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Rugby08boxcover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:48, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Rugby08boxcover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Rugby08boxcover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:22, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Northampton Saints player category

Quick question for you, as the person who started this category. Would you reckon it correct to include players from all of Northampton's history? I've just done a little tidy-up on Bob Taylor and wondered if it would be appropriate to categorise him and other players from the pre-professional days? Any thoughts?--Bcp67 (talk) 21:11, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Celtbrit.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Celtbrit.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:31, 19 August 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 11:31, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Image listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Kit shorts saintsaway.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 10:36, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

List of rugby union players banned for eye gouging

Hi. I'm proposing a change in article name here:- Talk:List of rugby union players banned for eye gouging if you would like to input. GainLine ♠ _♥ 13:35, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Trflogo2010.jpg

Greetings! I see that you have asserted here that you have the rights to the logo uploaded as File:Trflogo2010.jpg. However, permission to use the image cannot generally be doled out on a case-by-case basis. Further, I doubt an exception would be made via an OTRS request to use the image in a draft of an article in userspace. Accordingly, I've removed the image from the article.

Assuming The Rugby Forum is demonstrated to be notable and its article is moved to the encyclopedia, then a fair use rationale can be made for using the image, and the image can be included again. Alternatively, if you do hold the image, you can release that image (or an alteration thereof) under Creative Commons licensing, making it free content and usable anywhere on Wikipedia—with the drawback that it can then be used anywhere else for any purpose.

I know the rules are confusing, but unfortunately, the rules about images are strict. —C.Fred (talk) 22:47, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

• Please note that "Used on Wikipedia with permission" is still non-free use. If you want to retain rights to the image, you need to abide by the rules for non-free images on Wikipedia. As the rightsholder of the image, you cannot override WP:NFCC. Besides, why not work on improving the article, so this will cease to be an issue? —C.Fred (talk) 23:08, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
• Please stop restoring File:Trflogo2010.jpg to User:Welshman25/Enter your new article name here. The use of non-free media on userpages is not permitted by our policy at WP:NFCC #9. There is no wiggle room on this. It simply isn't permitted if the image is non-free, as is the case here. As discussed at User_talk:Welshman25, Welshman25 understands the issue now and has no problem with it not being on the page while it is developed. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 21:15, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Trflogo2010.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Trflogo2010.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:13, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Trflogo2010.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Trflogo2010.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:35, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Franklinsgardens.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Franklinsgardens.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

• The image has been deleted, as it is clearly a modification of the image from the Bing Maps service. That image is under copyright; it is impossible to manipulate or otherwise process it into a free image. —C.Fred (talk) 17:35, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Presumptive arsehole "Fred", aren't you. The image did NOT come from "Bing maps". The same as your BS you spouted about TRF a few months back.

So you're telling me you went up in a plane and took a photo from the same angle at the same time as the aerial photography that Bing used? Then provide the evidence. The claim doesn't hold water.

That said, if you'd like to discuss the matter civilly, I'm willing to. If you're going to continue with personal attacks as you did above, I'll just bring in another administrator to handle the situation—which could result in your account being blocked. —C.Fred (talk) 19:43, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Fuck off and leave my acount alone. Irritating child. And if you must know, it came from a screenshot of Google who operate a fair usage policy.

Know it all, yee-haw busybody.

November 2010

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 November 12, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. If you disagree with the deletion, then discuss it on that page. Deleting it altogether is considered vandalism. Terrillja _talk 16:57, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for making personal attacks on other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:13, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)