Tedm03
Please leave me a message!
Welcome!
edit
|
2020 United States gubernatorial elections
editIt seems like an inconsistent practice given that none of the other pages for gubernatorial elections have that format. This section of the talk page raised some concerns about it https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2020_United_States_gubernatorial_elections#Election_summary_section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.23.249.111 (talk) 20:44, 28 July 2020 (UTC) Should this be added to the other gubernatorial elections pages listed at Template:United States gubernatorial elections? Regardless of the outcome I think all the season pages should be consistent with each other. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.23.249.111 (talk) 20:55, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
- I went further in detail on the article page, but in brief, your edit was wrong and misguided, mainly because you don't understand Electoral Fusion, as it is used in very few states. Zuckerman is a Progressive, and him winning the Democratic nomination doesn't change that fact. He is running not running as only a Democrat, nor is that his first party. Like in prævious elections, he will be running as a Progressive/Democratic candidate, with the Progressive indicator coming first because it his main party MCUSRAP (talk) 13:41, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Blocked
editThis account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Peterjack1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:58, 18 August 2020 (UTC) |
@NinjaRobotPirate: I’m bored and unemployed. The only reason I was blocked in the first place is because I get overly passionate. Well at least I’m out there trying to make Wikipedia better while you just block people. Do you really think being the authoritarian police is helping Wikipedia? You’re just in it for the power, you find blocking people a fun hobby. Well screw you. It’s snakes like you who make Wikipedia less free for your own personal enjoyment. My enjoyment is trying to make something better for the greater good. I do what I feel is right and it’s wrong to punish someone for being overly passionate and reverting. Editors should have the freedom to revert if they wish, it can be the best way to solve disagreements sometimes. And besides that 90% of my edits have been positively impactful. Less than 10% of yours have. Not to mention that it’s creepy that you know my geolocation and network provider. That’s stalking and I’m surprised it’s legal, especially if you aren’t an employee of Wikipedia. Go to hell.