Talk to aoi
Talk to aoi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
don't u see content will promote hate towards china????????????????????????????????????so u don't care!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Talk to aoi (talk) 12:09, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 12:11, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Please be careful
editHi - I get you're probably annoyed that you've been blocked from editing that article, but don't vent by leaving weird messages on people's talk pages or you'll be blocked entirely.
I don't understand why you think that stuff is anti-Chinese 'hate'; it's sourced to two reputable news organisations, one of which is based on Hong Kong. It looks to me fairly like neutral reporting about online criticism of the nation's policies. Hate is definitely prohibited here, but reporting of criticism, where relevant, is not. The question of whether it is necessary to include it in the article is another matter, which I don't have a view on - that's down to editorial judgement, and can be discussed on the talk page, which you still have access to. Girth Summit (blether) 12:18, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
removing unblock review
editTalk to aoi, you are required to leave that block notice visible here until you're unblocked. You can remove almost anything else from this page, but that must stay.
I'm happy to discuss what you see as the problem with that content at Talk:Maggie Mac Neil and in fact have pinged you to a talk section there. —valereee (talk) 12:52, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
July 2021
edit
Per WP:BLANKING, declined requests cannot be removed until the block is removed. If you agree to stop removing it, access may be restored. 331dot (talk) 13:39, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 331dot (talk) 13:55, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as User:Jkjljkkjkl, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been deleted. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review 331dot (talk) 13:57, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Jiujiang Skyline.jpg
edit
A tag has been placed on File:Jiujiang Skyline.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Seloloving (talk) 13:55, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Mountain_Lu_Sunrise.jpg
edit
A tag has been placed on File:Mountain_Lu_Sunrise.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Balflear8 (talk) 18:07, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
edit
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.