Your submission at Articles for creation: The Great Transition – the personalization of finance is here (November 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:53, 21 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Tab global! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:53, 21 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

November 2022

edit
 

Hello Tab global. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:The Great Transition – the personalization of finance is here, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Tab global. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Tab global|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:54, 21 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, club, organization, company, or website, I have blocked this account from editing. You are welcome to continue editing after you have chosen a new username that complies with Wikipedia's username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable, regardless of the username that you choose. Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid or compensated in any way, you must disclose who is paying you to edit here.

Please take a moment to either create a new account, or request a username change of your current account here. The new username that you choose must represent you as an individual person, and it must comply with Wikipedia's username policy.
  • To create a new account with a different username, simply log out of this account and then click here to make a new one.
  • If you prefer to change the username on this account, you may do so by adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page here: {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken or in use by another account. You can go here to search and see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is available to be taken.

Please also note that you are permitted to use a username that contains the name of a company or organization if it also identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".

Appeals: If your username does not represent a group, organization, website, or other entity described above, and if you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page here: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

Thank you. Orange Mike | Talk 15:04, 21 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Tab global (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

We have some edited article already and we do not want to start from scratch. Rather than recreating, we prefer to change user name Tab global (talk) 15:13, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I have a great deal of concern with the use of "we" in your request. This clearly indicates that this is a corporate shared account, which is explicitly not allowed. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:15, 21 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
Why do Wikipedia disallow corporate sharing account? There are people who may use different name and then share it without your acknowledgement. Isn't Wikipedia content should be able to be publish freely by others?
The content we put up is legit and the resources comes from ourselves. Tab global (talk) 15:26, 21 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
For legal reasons, particularly copyright ones, our terms and conditions state clearly that each Wikipedia account must belong to a single unique individual, and may not be shared by them. This is not negotiable, and is part of the rules you agreed to when you set up an account.
Additionally, we need information from impartial third-party sources; if "the resources come from ourselves" then we have no reason to expect the content to be neutral and reliable.
Any editor who is editing Wikipedia for pay, including as part of a job or contract, MUST openly disclose their status as a paid editor. Failure to do so is grounds for blocking. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:54, 21 November 2022 (UTC)Reply